Suppr超能文献

通过使用PLEXITOM™体模进行测量,对剂量计算和输送进行预处理验证。

Pretreatment verification of dose calculation and delivery by means of measurements with PLEXITOM™ phantom.

作者信息

Wołowiec Paweł, Kukołowicz Paweł, Lis Krzysztof

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland.

Medical Physics Department, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland ; The Jan Kochanowski University of Humanities and Sciences, Kielce, Poland.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013 Feb 4;18(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.12.007. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

AIM

To validate a pretreatment verification method of dose calculation and dose delivery based on measurements with Metaplex PTW phantom.

BACKGROUND

The dose-response relationships for local tumor control and radiosensitive tissue complications are strong. It is widely accepted that an accuracy of dose delivery of about 3.5% (one standard deviation) is required in modern radiotherapy. This goal is difficult to achieve. This paper describes our experience with the control of dose delivery and calculations at the ICRU reference point.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The calculations of dose at the ICRU reference point performed with the treatment planning system CMS XiO were checked by measurements carried out in the PLEXITOM™ phantom. All measurements were performed with the ion chamber positioned in the phantom, at the central axis of the beam, at depth equivalent to the radiological depth (at gantry zero position). The source-to-phantom surface distance was always set to keep the source-to-detector distance equal to the reference point depth defined in the ICRU Report 50 (generally, 100 cm). The dose was measured according to IAEA TRS 398 report for measurements in solid phantoms. The measurement results were corrected with the actual accelerator's output factor and for the non-full scatter conditions. Measurements were made for 111 patients and 327 fields.

RESULTS

The average differences between measurements and calculations were 0.03% (SD = 1.4%), 0.3% (SD = 1.0%), 0.1% (SD = 1.1%), 0.6% (SD = 1.8%), 0.3% (SD = 1.5%) for all measurements, for total dose, for pelvis, thorax and H&N patients, respectively. Only in 15 cases (4.6%), the difference between the measured and the calculated dose was greater than 3%. For these fields, a detailed analysis was undertaken.

CONCLUSION

The verification method provides an instantaneous verification of dose calculations before the beginning of a patient's treatment. It allows to detect differences smaller than 3.5%.

摘要

目的

验证基于Metaplex PTW体模测量的剂量计算和剂量输送的预处理验证方法。

背景

局部肿瘤控制和放射敏感组织并发症的剂量反应关系密切。现代放射治疗中,剂量输送精度约为3.5%(一个标准差)已被广泛接受。但这一目标难以实现。本文描述了我们在ICRU参考点控制剂量输送和计算方面的经验。

材料与方法

使用治疗计划系统CMS XiO在ICRU参考点进行的剂量计算,通过在PLEXITOM™体模中进行的测量来检查。所有测量均在体模中,于射束中心轴、相当于放射学深度的深度(在机架零位)处,将电离室放置于此进行。源到体模表面的距离始终设置为使源到探测器的距离等于ICRU第50号报告中定义的参考点深度(通常为100 cm)。根据国际原子能机构TRS 398报告对固体体模中的测量进行剂量测量。测量结果用实际加速器的输出因子和非完全散射条件进行校正。对111例患者和327个射野进行了测量。

结果

所有测量、总剂量、盆腔、胸部和头颈部患者测量值与计算值的平均差异分别为0.03%(标准差=1.4%)、0.3%(标准差=1.0%)、0.1%(标准差=1.1%)、0.6%(标准差=1.8%)、0.3%(标准差=1.5%)。仅在15例(4.6%)中,测量剂量与计算剂量的差异大于3%。对这些射野进行了详细分析。

结论

该验证方法可在患者治疗开始前对剂量计算进行即时验证。它能够检测出小于3.5%的差异。

相似文献

1
Pretreatment verification of dose calculation and delivery by means of measurements with PLEXITOM™ phantom.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013 Feb 4;18(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.12.007. eCollection 2013.
3
Ion chamber and film-based quality assurance of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy.
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):5382-5395. doi: 10.1002/mp.15081. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Accuracy of Dose Calculation for Hemibody Treatments at Extended Distance Using a Commercial Treatment Planning System.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Jun;50(2):261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):447–456. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5510.
9
A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):128-138. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Organizational, technical, physical and clinical quality standards for radiotherapy.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 Jun 3;17(4):190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.05.001.
2
The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 Mar 6;17(2):63-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.02.001. eCollection 2012.
4
Computed tomography as a source of electron density information for radiation treatment planning.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Jun;186(6):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2086-5. Epub 2010 May 17.
7
Intra-fractional uncertainties in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Dec;184(12):668-73. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1875-6. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
9
Errors in radiation oncology: a study in pathways and dosimetric impact.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005 Summer;6(3):81-94. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v6i3.2105. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
10
Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验