*Department of Thoracic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; †Department of Oncology, Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; ‡Department of Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; §Department of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‖Department of Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; ¶Department of Oncology, Kinston Medical Specialists, P.A., Kinston, North Carolina; #Department of Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and **Department of Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Feb;9(2):214-21. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000071.
Second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves survival modestly but new strategies are needed. This trial was designed to evaluate an antivascular endothelial growth factor strategy with or without standard chemotherapy in previously treated NSCLC.
Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with performance status 0 to 1 progressive after first-line chemotherapy were eligible for randomization to pemetrexed, sunitinib, or the combination. Patients were stratified by performance status, stage, and sex. Primary objective was 18-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate; secondary objectives included response, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Target accrual was 225. The study was terminated early because of decreasing accrual rates.
Between April 2008 and September 2011, 130 patients were registered and randomized; of this, 125 patients were treated. Baseline characteristics in the three arms were well balanced. Toxicity was higher in the sunitinib-containing arms. The 18-week PFS rate in the pemetrexed, sunitinib, and combination arms was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40-71), 37% (95% CI, 25-54), and 48% (95% CI, 35-66), respectively (p = 0.25). Median PFS in the pemetrexed, sunitinib, and combination arms in months was 4.9 (2.1-8.8), 3.3 (2.3-4.2), and 3.7 (2.5-5.8), respectively (p = 0.18). There was an overall statistically significant difference in OS between the three arms: median OS in months was 10.5 (8.3-20.2) for pemetrexed, 8.0 (6.8-13.5) for sunitinib, and 6.7 (4.1-10.1) for the combination (p = 0.03).
Pemetrexed had a superior toxicity profile to either sunitinib or the combination of pemetrexed and sunitinib. The 18-week PFS rate was not significantly different between the arms. OS was significantly better with pemetrexed alone compared with the two sunitinib-containing arms, with the doublet performing worst for OS.
二线化疗可适度改善晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存,但仍需要新的策略。本试验旨在评估抗血管内皮生长因子策略联合或不联合标准化疗在既往治疗的 NSCLC 中的疗效。
入组标准为一线化疗后进展且 PS 0-1 的 IIIB/IV 期 NSCLC 患者,随机分配至培美曲塞、舒尼替尼或二者联合组。按 PS、分期和性别分层。主要终点为 18 周无进展生存(PFS)率;次要终点包括缓解率、总生存(OS)和毒性。目标入组人数为 225 例。由于入组率下降,该研究提前终止。
2008 年 4 月至 2011 年 9 月,共登记并随机分配了 130 例患者,其中 125 例接受了治疗。三组患者的基线特征均衡。舒尼替尼组毒性较高。培美曲塞、舒尼替尼和联合组的 18 周 PFS 率分别为 54%(95%CI,40-71)、37%(95%CI,25-54)和 48%(95%CI,35-66)(p=0.25)。培美曲塞、舒尼替尼和联合组的中位 PFS 分别为 4.9(2.1-8.8)、3.3(2.3-4.2)和 3.7(2.5-5.8)个月(p=0.18)。三组患者的 OS 存在统计学差异:中位 OS 分别为培美曲塞 10.5(8.3-20.2)、舒尼替尼 8.0(6.8-13.5)和联合组 6.7(4.1-10.1)个月(p=0.03)。
培美曲塞的毒性谱优于舒尼替尼或培美曲塞联合舒尼替尼。三组患者的 18 周 PFS 率无显著差异。与舒尼替尼组相比,培美曲塞单药治疗的 OS 更好,而联合组的 OS 最差。