Suppr超能文献

盆腔恶性肿瘤根治性切除术治疗后的生活质量和其他患者报告的结果。

Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2014 Feb;101(3):277-87. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9392. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic exenteration is highly radical surgery offering the only potential cure for locally advanced pelvic cancer. This study compared quality of life and other relevant patient-reported outcomes over 12 months for patients who did and those who did not undergo pelvic exenteration.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for consideration of pelvic exenteration completed clinical and patient-reported outcome assessments at baseline, hospital discharge (exenteration patients only), and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Outcomes included cancer-specific quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal; FACT-C), physical and mental health status (Short Form 36 version 2), psychological distress (Distress Thermometer), and pain (study-specific composite) scores. Linear mixed modelling compared trajectories between exenteration and no-exenteration groups.

RESULTS

Among 182 patients, 148 (81.3 per cent) proceeded to exenteration. There were no baseline differences between the two groups. Among patients who had exenteration, the mean FACT-C score at baseline of 93.0 had reduced by 14·4 points at hospital discharge, but increased to 86·7 at 1 month after surgery and continued to improve, returning to baseline by 9 months. For patients in the no-exenteration group, FACT-C scores decreased between baseline and 1 month, increased slowly to 6 months and then began to decline at 9 months. There were few statistically or clinically significant differences in any patient-reported outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life and related patient-reported outcomes improve rapidly after pelvic exenteration surgery. For 9 months after surgery, these outcomes are comparable with those of similar do patients who do not have surgery; thereafter, there is a decline in patients who do not have exenteration. Pelvic exenteration can be performed with acceptable quality of life and patient-reported outcomes.

摘要

背景

盆腔廓清术是一种高度激进的手术,为局部晚期盆腔癌提供了唯一潜在的治愈机会。本研究比较了接受和未接受盆腔廓清术的患者在 12 个月内的生活质量和其他相关患者报告结果。

方法

连续转诊接受盆腔廓清术评估的患者在基线、出院(仅廓清术患者)以及 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月时完成临床和患者报告结果评估。结果包括癌症特异性生活质量(癌症治疗功能评估-结直肠癌;FACT-C)、身体和心理健康状况(SF-36 版本 2)、心理困扰(困扰温度计)和疼痛(研究特异性综合)评分。线性混合模型比较了廓清术组和非廓清术组之间的轨迹。

结果

在 182 名患者中,148 名(81.3%)接受了廓清术。两组在基线时没有差异。在接受廓清术的患者中,基线时的 FACT-C 评分 93.0 分,出院时降低了 14.4 分,但在手术后 1 个月时增加到 86.7 分,并继续改善,在 9 个月时恢复到基线。对于未接受廓清术的患者,FACT-C 评分在基线至 1 个月期间下降,缓慢增加至 6 个月,然后在 9 个月时开始下降。两组在任何患者报告结果方面差异均无统计学意义或临床意义。

结论

盆腔廓清术后生活质量和相关患者报告结果迅速改善。手术后 9 个月,这些结果与未接受手术的类似患者相似;此后,未接受廓清术的患者结果下降。盆腔廓清术可以获得可接受的生活质量和患者报告结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验