Tragord Bradley S, Gill Norman W, Silvernail Jason L, Teyhen Deydre S, Allison Stephen C
Army-Baylor University Doctoral Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
US Army-Baylor Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 Nov;21(4):196-206. doi: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000033.
This study determined biomechanical force parameters and reliability among clinicians performing knee joint mobilizations.
Sixteen subjects with knee osteoarthritis and six therapists participated in the study. Forces were recorded using a capacitive-based pressure mat for three techniques at two grades of mobilization, each with two trials of 15 seconds. Dosage (force-time integral), amplitude, and frequency were also calculated. Analysis of variance was used to analyze grade differences, intraclass correlation coefficients determined reliability, and correlations assessed force associations with subject and rater variables.
Grade IV mobilizations produced higher mean forces (P<0.001) and higher dosage (P<0.001), while grade III produced higher maximum forces (P = 0.001). Grade III forces (Newtons) by technique (mean, maximum) were: extension 48, 81; flexion 41, 68; and medial glide 21, 34. Grade IV forces (Newtons) by technique (mean, maximum) were: extension 58, 78; flexion 44, 60; and medial glide 22, 30. Frequency (Hertz) ranged between 0.9-1.1 (grade III) and 1.4-1.6 (grade IV). Intra-clinician reliability was excellent (>0.90). Inter-clinician reliability was moderate for force and dosage, and poor for amplitude and frequency.
Force measurements were consistent with previously reported ranges and clinical constructs. Grade III and grade IV mobilizations can be distinguished from each other with differences for force and frequency being small, and dosage and amplitude being large. Intra-clinician reliability was excellent for all biomechanical parameters and inter-clinician reliability for dosage, the main variable of clinical interest, was moderate. This study quantified the applied forces among multiple clinicians, which may help determine optimal dosage and standardize care.
本研究确定了进行膝关节松动术的临床医生之间的生物力学力参数及可靠性。
16名膝关节骨关节炎患者和6名治疗师参与了本研究。使用基于电容的压力垫记录三种技术在两个松动等级下的力,每个等级进行两次15秒的试验。还计算了剂量(力-时间积分)、幅度和频率。采用方差分析来分析等级差异,组内相关系数确定可靠性,并评估力与受试者及评估者变量之间的相关性。
IV级松动产生更高的平均力(P<0.001)和更高的剂量(P<0.001),而III级产生更高的最大力(P = 0.001)。按技术(平均、最大)划分的III级力(牛顿)分别为:伸展48、81;屈曲41、68;内侧滑动21、34。按技术(平均、最大)划分的IV级力(牛顿)分别为:伸展58、78;屈曲44、60;内侧滑动22、30。频率(赫兹)范围在0.9 - 1.1(III级)和1.4 - 1.6(IV级)之间。临床医生内部的可靠性极佳(>0.90)。临床医生之间的力和剂量可靠性中等,而幅度和频率可靠性较差。
力的测量结果与先前报道的范围和临床概念一致。III级和IV级松动可以相互区分,力和频率的差异较小,而剂量和幅度的差异较大。临床医生内部对所有生物力学参数的可靠性极佳,而临床医生之间对剂量(临床关注的主要变量)的可靠性中等。本研究量化了多名临床医生施加的力,这可能有助于确定最佳剂量并规范护理。