• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院业务流程再造(BPR)项目各阶段成功的重要因素。

Important factors for success in hospital BPR project phases.

作者信息

Caccia-Bava Mariado Carmo, Guimaraes Valerie C K, Guimaraes Tor

机构信息

Social Medicine Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(8):729-45. doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2012-0007.

DOI:10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2012-0007
PMID:24422262
Abstract

PURPOSE

Business process reengineering (BPR) is touted in the literature as the dramatic improvements necessary for competitiveness, but in practice there are many unsuccessful cases. A more systematic and rigorous factor-assessment deemed important to each BPR phase and overall project success is needed. This paper aims to assess the extent to which proposed success factors in a hospital contribute to each BPR phase's success..

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Based on the relevant literature, desirable results from each project phase were defined. Overall project success was defined as the benefits hospital managers derive from BPR according to manager opinions. A total of 192 hospital administrators shared their last BPR experience, where changes were operational for at least one year.

FINDINGS

Recommendations are made for hospital managers to focus attention and resources on factors important to BPR success. Hospital managers are not emphasizing the most important activities and tasks recommended in the BPR literature, such as changes to customer/market related business processes, every business activity's value-added element and applying the right innovative technology. Based on the whole findings, top managers should not engage BPR before ensuring that important success factors are present.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While many researchers identified and/or tested factors important to BPR success, this is the first study to explore BPR success factors' importance to each project phase, from inception to overall project success assessment phase.

摘要

目的

业务流程再造(BPR)在文献中被誉为提升竞争力所需的重大改进,但在实践中却有许多失败案例。需要对每个BPR阶段以及项目整体成功至关重要的因素进行更系统、更严格的评估。本文旨在评估医院中提出的成功因素对每个BPR阶段成功的贡献程度。

设计/方法/途径:基于相关文献,定义了每个项目阶段的理想结果。根据管理者的意见,将项目整体成功定义为医院管理者从BPR中获得的收益。共有192位医院管理人员分享了他们上一次BPR的经验,这些变革至少已实施一年。

研究结果

建议医院管理者将注意力和资源集中在对BPR成功至关重要的因素上。医院管理者没有强调BPR文献中推荐的最重要的活动和任务,例如与客户/市场相关的业务流程变革、每项业务活动的增值要素以及应用合适的创新技术。基于整体研究结果,高层管理者在确保存在重要成功因素之前不应开展BPR。

原创性/价值:虽然许多研究人员确定和/或测试了对BPR成功至关重要的因素,但这是第一项从项目启动到整体项目成功评估阶段,探讨BPR成功因素对每个项目阶段重要性的研究。

相似文献

1
Important factors for success in hospital BPR project phases.医院业务流程再造(BPR)项目各阶段成功的重要因素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(8):729-45. doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2012-0007.
2
Empirically testing determinants of hospital BPR success.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(6-7):552-63. doi: 10.1108/09526860510627238.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Testing some major determinants for hospital innovation success.测试医院创新成功的一些主要决定因素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(5):454-70. doi: 10.1108/09526860910975571.
5
Studer Group® ' s evidence-based leadership initiatives.施图德集团基于证据的领导力倡议。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(6):684-700. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0211.
6
Lean practices for quality results: a case illustration.实现优质成果的精益实践:一个案例说明
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(8):729-41. doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-03-2014-0024.
7
Effects of organizational context on Lean implementation in five hospital systems.组织环境对五个医院系统中精益实施的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):127-44. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000049.
8
What drives continuous improvement project success in healthcare?推动医疗保健领域持续改进项目成功的因素是什么?
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Feb 13;30(1):43-57. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2016-0035.
9
Improving hospital efficiency: a process model of organizational change commitments.提高医院效率:组织变革承诺的过程模型
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Feb;71(1):21-42. doi: 10.1177/1077558713504464. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
10
Interactional Resources for Quality Improvement: Learning From Participants Through a Qualitative Study.质量改进的互动资源:通过定性研究向参与者学习
Qual Manag Health Care. 2017 Apr/Jun;26(2):55-62. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000128.

引用本文的文献

1
The Behavioral and Social Dimension of the Public Health System of European Countries: Descriptive, Canonical, and Factor Analysis.欧洲国家公共卫生系统的行为与社会维度:描述性、典范性和因子分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054419.
2
The Quality of Medical Care in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic, with Particular Emphasis on the Access to Primary Healthcare and the Effectiveness of Treatment in Poland.新冠疫情背景下的医疗服务质量,特别强调波兰的初级医疗保健可及性及治疗效果
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 9;10(16):3502. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163502.
3
Proposing evidence-based strategies to strengthen implementation of healthcare reform in resource-limited settings: a summative analysis.
提出基于证据的策略以加强资源有限环境下医疗改革的实施:一项总结性分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 20;6(9):e012582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012582.