Oofuvong Maliwan, Siripruekpong Sirikarn, Naklongdee Jumras, Hnookong Rewadee, Lakateb Chareefar
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Nov;96(11):1470-5.
To compare the incidence and severity of emergence agitation, recovery profile, and adverse events between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in unpremedicated pediatric ambulatory urologic surgery patients.
The study was conducted among 136 healthy children, aged six months to nine years, and randomized to two groups, sevoflurane and desflurane, during maintenance anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway. Recovery profile and perioperative adverse events were recorded. The emergence agitation (EA) was assessed using a 4-point scale by an anesthetist nurse in the recovery room who was blinded to the treatment.
The incidences of EA between sevoflurane/desflurane were not significantly different at 36.8%/41.2%, p = 0.73, and neither was the median (IQR) of severity (2 (1, 3)/2 (1, 3), p = 0.4). The awakening time in the desflurane group was 6.4 +/- 4.0 minutes, faster than in the sevoflurane group of 10.6 +/- 7.6 minutes (p < 0.001). The number of children having intraoperative respiratory events was significantly higher in the desflurane group (17), compared to the sevoflurane group (7) (p = 0.043).
The occurrence of EA and adverse events between sevoflurane and desflurane were not different, except that the overall of intraoperative respiratory events was higher in desflurane group.
比较在未使用术前药的小儿门诊泌尿外科手术患者中,地氟烷和七氟烷麻醉后苏醒期躁动的发生率及严重程度、恢复情况和不良事件。
本研究纳入136名6个月至9岁的健康儿童,在喉罩气道维持麻醉期间随机分为两组,七氟烷组和地氟烷组。记录恢复情况和围手术期不良事件。由恢复室中对治疗不知情的麻醉护士使用4分制量表评估苏醒期躁动(EA)。
七氟烷/地氟烷组的EA发生率无显著差异,分别为36.8%/41.2%,p = 0.73,严重程度的中位数(IQR)也无差异(2(1,3)/2(1,3),p = 0.4)。地氟烷组的苏醒时间为6.4±4.0分钟,比七氟烷组的10.6±7.6分钟快(p < 0.001)。地氟烷组术中发生呼吸事件的儿童数量(17例)显著高于七氟烷组(7例)(p = 0.043)。
七氟烷和地氟烷之间EA和不良事件的发生情况无差异,只是地氟烷组术中呼吸事件的总体发生率较高。