• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的抗血小板治疗:一项回顾性观察研究

Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study of prasugrel and clopidogrel.

机构信息

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12051.

DOI:10.1111/1755-5922.12051
PMID:24428852
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a therapeutic success when supported by dual antiplatelet therapy. Prasugrel has been introduced as a potential alternative to clopidogrel alongside aspirin. We aimed to assess prasugrel versus clopidogrel mortality outcomes in patients admitted with STEMI undergoing PPCI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 1688 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI at a regional tertiary centre. Patients with age ≥75 years, weight<60 kg or history of cerebrovascular accident or TIA's, active bleeding or known hepatic impairment were excluded. All patients from March 2008 to 16 December 2009 belong to the Clopidogrel group and from 17 December 2009 to June 2011 belong to the Prasugrel group.

RESULTS

A total of 866 patients were in the Clopidogrel group and 822 patients in the prasugrel group. In-hospital mortality was 1.7% in the Clopidogrel and 1.5% in Prasugrel group (P = 0.40). 30-day postdischarge mortality was 2.4% and 1.8% (P = 0.25) in the Clopidogrel and Prasugrel group, respectively. One-year mortality rate was recorded in 62 patients (3.7%): 39 (4.5%) in the Clopidogrel group and 23 (2.8%) in the prasugrel group. In the Cox proportional hazard model, the adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality for the prasugrel group was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.253-0.881; P = 0.018). Independent predictors of one-year mortality postdischarge were age, admission creatinine and haemoglobin, admission heart rate, total ischaemic time, the presence of multivessel coronary artery disease, previous MI and post-PCI TIMI flow.

CONCLUSION

In PPCI-treated STEMI patients, prasugrel is associated with a significant reduction in one-year mortality compared with clopidogrel.

摘要

背景

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)时,双联抗血小板治疗可提高治疗成功率。普拉格雷已被推荐为氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林的替代药物。我们旨在评估 STEMI 患者行 PPCI 时应用普拉格雷和氯吡格雷的死亡率结局。

方法

回顾性分析在一家地区性三级中心行 PPCI 的 1688 例连续 STEMI 患者的前瞻性采集数据。排除年龄≥75 岁、体重<60kg 或有脑血管意外或短暂性脑缺血发作史、有活动性出血或已知肝功能损害的患者。所有患者中,2008 年 3 月至 2009 年 12 月 16 日接受氯吡格雷治疗,2009 年 12 月 17 日至 2011 年 6 月接受普拉格雷治疗。

结果

共 866 例患者接受氯吡格雷治疗,822 例患者接受普拉格雷治疗。氯吡格雷组住院期间死亡率为 1.7%,普拉格雷组为 1.5%(P=0.40)。氯吡格雷组和普拉格雷组的 30 天出院后死亡率分别为 2.4%和 1.8%(P=0.25)。62 例患者(3.7%)记录到 1 年死亡率:氯吡格雷组 39 例(4.5%),普拉格雷组 23 例(2.8%)。在 Cox 比例风险模型中,普拉格雷组全因死亡率的调整后危险比为 0.47(95%CI:0.253-0.881;P=0.018)。出院后 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素为年龄、入院时肌酐和血红蛋白、入院时心率、总缺血时间、多支冠状动脉疾病、既往心肌梗死和 PCI 后 TIMI 血流。

结论

在 STEMI 患者行 PPCI 治疗时,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷可显著降低 1 年死亡率。

相似文献

1
Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study of prasugrel and clopidogrel.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的抗血小板治疗:一项回顾性观察研究
Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12051.
2
Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较(TRITON-TIMI 38):双盲随机对照试验
Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60441-4.
3
Double-blind, randomized, prospective comparison of loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel versus 60 mg prasugrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention: the ETAMI trial (early thienopyridine treatment to improve primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction).双盲、随机、前瞻性比较 600mg 氯吡格雷与 60mg 普拉格雷在拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的负荷剂量:ETAMI 试验(早期噻吩吡啶治疗改善急性心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
4
Safety of Prasugrel Loading Doses in Patients Pre-Loaded With Clopidogrel in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Nonrandomized Observational Study.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,患者预先使用氯吡格雷后给予普拉格雷负荷剂量的安全性:一项非随机观察性研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1064-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.023.
5
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 subgroup analysis (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38).根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的疗效比较:TRITON-TIMI 38 亚组分析(评估通过优化血小板抑制改善治疗结果的试验:替格瑞洛在心肌梗死中的疗效 38)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(6):604-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.160.
6
Discharge aspirin dose and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an analysis from the TRITON-TIMI 38 study (trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38).普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的阿司匹林剂量与临床结局:来自 TRITON-TIMI 38 研究的分析(评估通过优化血小板抑制作用改善治疗结局的试验,普拉格雷-心肌梗死溶栓 38)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 28;63(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
7
Antiplatelet effect of thienopyridine (clopidogrel or prasugrel) pretreatment in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.噻吩吡啶(氯吡格雷或普拉格雷)预处理对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的抗血小板作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;112(10):1551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
8
An analysis of TRITON-TIMI 38, based on the 12 month recommended length of therapy in the European label for prasugrel.基于普拉格雷欧洲药品说明书中推荐的12个月治疗时长对TRITON-TIMI 38研究进行的分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Nov;30(11):2193-205. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.944638. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
9
Outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with clopidogrel versus prasugrel (from the INFUSE-AMI trial).氯吡格雷与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者的结局(来自 INFUSE-AMI 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 1;113(9):1457-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
Critical review of prasugrel for formulary decision makers.为处方集决策者对普拉格雷进行的批判性综述。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 May;15(4):335-43. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.4.335.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of cardiovascular risk scores in native and migrant South Asian populations.南亚本地人群与移民人群心血管风险评分的比较。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 May 11;11:100594. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100594. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.真实世界中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的比较。
Open Heart. 2019 Jun 29;6(1):e000951. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951. eCollection 2019.
3
Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second- Versus Third-Generation P2Y12 Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study.
在CvLPRIT研究中,接受第二代与第三代P2Y12拮抗剂治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病伴ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的梗死面积。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 31;5(6):e003403. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003403.
4
Mortality in primary angioplasty patients starting antiplatelet therapy with prehospital prasugrel or clopidogrel: a 1-year follow-up from the European MULTIPRAC Registry.在接受院前普拉格雷或氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗的直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术患者中的死亡率:来自欧洲MULTIPRAC注册研究的1年随访结果
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Apr 19;12:143-51. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S95391. eCollection 2016.