McMorrow Stacey, Kenney Genevieve M, Goin Dana
The authors are with the Health Policy Center of the Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2392-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301569. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
We examined preventive care use by nonelderly adults (aged 18-64 years) before the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and considered the contributions of insurance coverage and other factors to service use patterns.
We used data from the 2005-2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to measure the receipt of 8 recommended preventive services. We examined gaps in receipt of services for adults with incomes below 400% of the federal poverty level compared with higher incomes. We then used a regression-based decomposition analysis to consider factors that explain the gaps in service use by income.
There were large income-related disparities in preventive care receipt for nonelderly adults. Differences in insurance coverage explain 25% to 40% of the disparities in preventive service use by income, but education, age, and health status are also important drivers.
Expanding coverage to lower-income adults through the ACA is expected to increase their preventive care use. However, the importance of education, age, and health status in explaining income-related gaps in service use indicates that the ACA cannot address all barriers to preventive care and additional interventions may be necessary.
我们研究了《平价医疗法案》(ACA)实施之前非老年成年人(18 - 64岁)的预防性保健使用情况,并考虑了保险覆盖范围和其他因素对服务使用模式的影响。
我们使用2005 - 2010年医疗支出面板调查的数据来衡量8项推荐预防性服务的接受情况。我们研究了收入低于联邦贫困水平400%的成年人与高收入成年人在服务接受方面的差距。然后,我们使用基于回归的分解分析来考虑解释按收入划分的服务使用差距的因素。
非老年成年人在预防性保健接受方面存在与收入相关的巨大差异。保险覆盖范围的差异解释了按收入划分的预防性服务使用差异的25%至40%,但教育、年龄和健康状况也是重要的驱动因素。
通过ACA将保险覆盖范围扩大到低收入成年人预计会增加他们对预防性保健的使用。然而,教育、年龄和健康状况在解释与收入相关的服务使用差距方面的重要性表明,ACA无法消除预防性保健的所有障碍,可能需要额外的干预措施。