11 Medical Park Dr, Ste 106, Pomona, NY 10970
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;74(12):1199-206. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08642.
To examine the risk of cardiovascular outcomes and diabetes mellitus in patients prescribed second-generation antipsychotics.
From the MarketScan claims database, nondiabetic adults prescribed aripiprazole between July 2003 and March 2010 were propensity score-matched with patients prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Patients were followed through the claims for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes indicating myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, coronary bypass/angioplasty procedures, and incident diabetes. Incidence rates of each outcome were calculated and compared between aripiprazole and the other second-generation antipsychotics using Cox models.
Aripiprazole initiators were matched 1:1 to 9,917 olanzapine, 14,935 quetiapine, 10,192 risperidone, and 5,696 ziprasidone initiators. Increased risk was found with olanzapine for stroke (hazard ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.95) and any cardiovascular event (1.28; 1.05-1.55); with quetiapine for stroke (1.58; 1.19-2.09), heart failure (1.55; 1.15-2.11), and any cardiovascular event (1.50; 1.25-1.79); and with risperidone for stroke (1.54; 1.12-2.12), heart failure (1.43; 1.02-1.99), and any cardiovascular event (1.49; 1.21-1.83). Ziprasidone showed no significant difference in risk from aripiprazole for any outcome. Incidence of diabetes ranged from 18 to 21 events per 1,000 person-years in each cohort and did not differ significantly between second-generation drugs.
This analysis of real-world data found lower risk of some cardiovascular events with aripiprazole than with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone, but no differences were found with ziprasidone. There were no significant differences in risk of diabetes. Limitations include use of claims data and inability to adequately control for differential prescribing of second-generation antipsychotics to patients at higher risk of diabetes.
研究第二代抗精神病药物处方患者发生心血管结局和糖尿病的风险。
从 MarketScan 理赔数据库中,选择 2003 年 7 月至 2010 年 3 月期间服用阿立哌唑的非糖尿病成年患者,与服用奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮和齐拉西酮的患者进行倾向评分匹配。通过国际疾病分类,第九版代码对心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭、冠状动脉旁路/血管成形术和新发糖尿病进行理赔追踪。使用 Cox 模型计算每种结局的发生率,并比较阿立哌唑与其他第二代抗精神病药物的发生率。
阿立哌唑的起始患者与 9917 例奥氮平、14935 例喹硫平、10192 例利培酮和 5696 例齐拉西酮的起始患者进行了 1:1 匹配。奥氮平增加了中风(风险比=1.43;95%置信区间,1.05-1.95)和任何心血管事件(1.28;1.05-1.55)的风险;喹硫平增加了中风(1.58;1.19-2.09)、心力衰竭(1.55;1.15-2.11)和任何心血管事件(1.50;1.25-1.79)的风险;利培酮增加了中风(1.54;1.12-2.12)、心力衰竭(1.43;1.02-1.99)和任何心血管事件(1.49;1.21-1.83)的风险。齐拉西酮在任何结局上与阿立哌唑相比,风险无显著差异。每个队列中糖尿病的发病率为 18 至 21 例/1000 人年,第二代药物之间无显著差异。
本项真实世界数据分析发现,与奥氮平、喹硫平或利培酮相比,阿立哌唑发生某些心血管事件的风险较低,但与齐拉西酮无差异。糖尿病的风险无显著差异。局限性包括使用理赔数据,以及无法充分控制第二代抗精神病药物在糖尿病高危患者中的差异处方。