Suppr超能文献

前列腺细胞系作为生物标志物发现的模型:当前标志物的性能和新标志物的寻找。

Prostate cell lines as models for biomarker discovery: performance of current markers and the search for new biomarkers.

机构信息

Mechanisms in Cell Biology and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Prostate. 2014 May;74(5):547-60. doi: 10.1002/pros.22777. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer cell lines have been used in the search for biomarkers that are suitable for prostate cancer diagnosis. Unfortunately, many cell line studies have only involved single cell lines, partially characterized cell lines or were performed without controls, and this may have been detrimental to effective biomarker discovery. We have analyzed a panel of prostate cancer and nonmalignant control cell lines using current biomarkers and then investigated a set of prospective endosomal and lysosomal proteins to search for new biomarkers.

METHODS

Western blotting was used to define the amount of protein and specific molecular forms in cell extracts and culture media from a panel of nonmalignant (RWPE-1, PNT1a, PNT2) and prostate cancer (22RV1, CaHPV10, DU-145, LNCaP) cell lines. Gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR.

RESULTS

HPV-18 transfected cell lines displayed a different pattern of protein and gene expression when compared to the other cell lines examined, suggesting that these cell lines may not be the most optimal for prostate cancer biomarker discovery. There was an increased amount of prostatic acid phosphatase and kallikrein proteins in LNCaP cell extracts and culture media, but variable amounts of these proteins in other prostate cancer cell lines. There were minimal differences in the amounts of lysosomal proteins detected in prostate cancer cells and culture media, but two endosomal proteins, cathepsin B and acid ceramidase, had increased gene and protein expression, and certain molecular forms showed increased secretion from prostate cancer cells (P ≤ 0.05). LIMP-2 gene and protein expression was significantly increased in prostate cancer compared to nonmalignant cell lines (P ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While the existing prostate cancer biomarkers and lysosomal proteins investigated here were not able to specifically differentiate between a panel of nonmalignant and prostate cancer cell lines, endosomal proteins showed some discriminatory capacity. LIMP-2 is a critical regulator of endosome biogenesis and the increased expression observed in prostate cancer cells indicated that other endosome related proteins may also be upregulated and could be investigated as novel biomarkers.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌细胞系已被用于寻找适合前列腺癌诊断的生物标志物。不幸的是,许多细胞系研究仅涉及单个细胞系、部分特征化的细胞系或在没有对照的情况下进行,这可能不利于有效生物标志物的发现。我们使用当前的生物标志物分析了一组前列腺癌和非恶性对照细胞系,然后研究了一组潜在的内体和溶酶体蛋白,以寻找新的生物标志物。

方法

使用 Western blot 分析了一组非恶性(RWPE-1、PNT1a、PNT2)和前列腺癌细胞系(22RV1、CaHPV10、DU-145、LNCaP)的细胞提取物和培养基中的蛋白质含量和特定分子形式。通过 qRT-PCR 确定基因表达。

结果

与其他检测的细胞系相比,HPV-18 转染的细胞系显示出不同的蛋白质和基因表达模式,这表明这些细胞系可能不是用于前列腺癌生物标志物发现的最佳选择。LNCaP 细胞提取物和培养基中前列腺酸性磷酸酶和激肽释放酶蛋白的含量增加,但其他前列腺癌细胞系中这些蛋白的含量不同。在前列腺癌细胞和培养基中检测到的溶酶体蛋白的量差异很小,但两种内体蛋白,组织蛋白酶 B 和酸性神经酰胺酶,基因和蛋白表达增加,某些分子形式从前列腺癌细胞中分泌增加(P≤0.05)。与非恶性细胞系相比,LIMP-2 基因和蛋白表达在前列腺癌中显著增加(P≤0.05)。

结论

虽然这里研究的现有前列腺癌生物标志物和溶酶体蛋白不能特异性地区分一组非恶性和前列腺癌细胞系,但内体蛋白显示出一定的区分能力。LIMP-2 是内体生物发生的关键调节因子,在前列腺癌细胞中观察到的表达增加表明其他内体相关蛋白也可能上调,并可作为新的生物标志物进行研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验