Bull Rosalind, Youl Loren, Robertson Iain K, Mace Rose, Challenor Sarah, Fassett Robert G
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
J Ren Care. 2014 Mar;40(1):64-73. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12049. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
Despite the terminal nature of chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-of-life care planning is often inconsistent and pathways to palliative care are unclear. Health professionals' perceptions of palliative care and the prevailing context may influence their end-of-life decision making.
To identify predictors of conservative treatment decisions and their associations with referral to palliative care, and to determine the perceptions that health professionals have about the role of palliative care in management of CKD.
A retrospective audit of deceased patients' charts, spanning three years, and a survey of renal healthcare professionals, documenting CKD palliative care practices, knowledge and attitudes was carried out. Records of all patients with CKD dying between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 in Australian regional renal service were audited. Renal staff from the service were surveyed. Logistic regression for binomial outcomes and ordinal logistic regression when more than two outcome levels were involved; and thematic analysis using a continual cross comparative approach was undertaken.
Loss of function, particularly from stroke, and severe pain are interpreted as representing levels of suffering which would justify the need to withdraw from renal replacement therapy. Family and/or patient indecision complicates and disrupts end-of-life care planning and can establish a cycle of ambiguity. Whilst renal healthcare professionals support early discussion of end-of-life care at predialysis education, congruity with the patient and family when making the final decision is of great importance.
Healthcare professionals' beliefs, values and knowledge of palliative care influence their end-of-life care decisions. The influence of patient, family and clinicians involves negotiation and equivocation. Health professionals support the early discussion of end-of-life care in CKD at predialysis education to enable clearer decision making.
尽管慢性肾脏病(CKD)具有终末期的特性,但临终关怀规划往往不一致,且姑息治疗的途径尚不明确。卫生专业人员对姑息治疗的认知以及当前的环境可能会影响他们的临终决策。
确定保守治疗决策的预测因素及其与转介至姑息治疗的关联,并确定卫生专业人员对姑息治疗在CKD管理中的作用的看法。
对三年来已故患者的病历进行回顾性审计,并对肾脏医疗保健专业人员进行调查,记录CKD姑息治疗的实践、知识和态度。对2006年1月1日至2008年12月31日期间在澳大利亚地区肾脏服务机构死亡的所有CKD患者的记录进行审计。对该服务机构的肾脏工作人员进行调查。对二项式结果进行逻辑回归分析,当涉及两个以上结果水平时进行有序逻辑回归分析;并采用持续交叉比较方法进行主题分析。
功能丧失,尤其是中风导致的功能丧失,以及剧痛被视为代表痛苦程度,这将证明有必要停止肾脏替代治疗。家庭和/或患者的犹豫不决使临终关怀规划复杂化并受到干扰,并可能形成一个模糊不清的循环。虽然肾脏医疗保健专业人员支持在透析前教育中尽早讨论临终关怀,但在做出最终决定时与患者和家属保持一致非常重要。
卫生专业人员对姑息治疗的信念、价值观和知识会影响他们的临终关怀决策。患者、家庭和临床医生的影响涉及协商和含糊不清。卫生专业人员支持在透析前教育中尽早讨论CKD的临终关怀,以便做出更明确的决策。