de Barbieri Ilaria, Strini Veronica, Noble Helen, Carswell Claire, Rocchi Marco Bruno Luigi, Sisti Davide
Woman's and Child's Health Department, Padua University Hospital, 45128 Padova, Italy.
Clinical Research Unit, Padua University Hospital, 45128 Padova, Italy.
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):220-229. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14010018.
Palliative care (PC) focuses on relieving pain and difficult symptoms rather than treating disease or delaying its progress. Palliative care views death as a natural process and allows patients to live the last phase of their existence in the best possible way, encouraging them to express their opinions and wishes for a good death. Interventions are advocated to control symptoms and distress and promote wellbeing and social functioning. A multidisciplinary approach to support patients receiving palliative care is encouraged.
The aims of this study were to investigate the facilitators and barriers to PC in people with kidney disease from a nursing perspective and to explore predictive factors associated with nurse-perceived facilitators and barriers to PC in people with kidney disease.
This study is a survey that adopted a questionnaire created in 2021 with Delphi methology, which included 73 statements divided into 37 facilitators and 36 barriers to PC in patients with kidney disease, to be scored using a Likert scale.
Participants were obtained through the membership database of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA) of 2020. Inclusion criteria included being registered as a nurse, an EDTNA/ERCA member and understanding of the English language. The questionnaire was sent via email.
Three profiles of respondents were found: the first group was characterized by the highest agreement percentages of facilitators and with an average value of 53.7% in barriers; the second was characterized by a lower endorsement of facilitators and similar agreement to the first group for barriers; the third group had a high probability (>80%) of items endorsing both barriers and facilitators. Predictive variables were significantly associated with "Years in nephrology" and "macro geographic area".
This study demonstrates variation in PC practice across Europe. Some professionals identified fewer barriers to PC and appeared more confident when dealing with difficult situations in a patient's care pathway, while others identified more barriers as obstacles to the implementation of adequate treatment. The number of years of nephrology experience and the geographical area of origin predicted how nurses would respond. This study was not registered.
姑息治疗(PC)侧重于缓解疼痛和困难症状,而非治疗疾病或延缓其进展。姑息治疗将死亡视为自然过程,让患者以尽可能好的方式度过生命的最后阶段,鼓励他们表达对善终的看法和愿望。提倡采取干预措施来控制症状和痛苦,促进福祉和社会功能。鼓励采用多学科方法来支持接受姑息治疗的患者。
本研究旨在从护理角度调查肾病患者姑息治疗的促进因素和障碍,并探索与护士所感知的肾病患者姑息治疗促进因素和障碍相关的预测因素。
本研究是一项调查,采用了2021年创建的问卷,运用德尔菲法,其中包括73条陈述,分为肾病患者姑息治疗的37个促进因素和36个障碍,使用李克特量表评分。
参与者通过2020年欧洲透析与移植护士协会/欧洲肾脏护理协会(EDTNA/ERCA)的会员数据库获得。纳入标准包括注册护士、EDTNA/ERCA会员以及懂英语。问卷通过电子邮件发送。
发现了三类受访者:第一组的特点是促进因素的赞同率最高,障碍的平均值为53.7%;第二组的特点是促进因素的认可度较低,障碍方面与第一组的赞同率相似;第三组对障碍和促进因素的项目赞同概率都很高(>80%)。预测变量与“肾病工作年限”和“宏观地理区域”显著相关。
本研究表明欧洲各地姑息治疗实践存在差异。一些专业人员发现姑息治疗的障碍较少,在处理患者护理路径中的困难情况时显得更有信心,而另一些人则发现更多障碍是实施充分治疗的阻碍。肾病工作年限和原籍地理区域预测了护士的反应方式。本研究未注册。