Suppr超能文献

计算机化数字心电图机基于算法的心电图间期和时程自动测量的比较。

Comparison of automated measurements of electrocardiographic intervals and durations by computer-based algorithms of digital electrocardiographs.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

AMPS-LLC, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2014 Feb;167(2):150-159.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Automated measurements of electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals are widely used by clinicians for individual patient diagnosis and by investigators in population studies. We examined whether clinically significant systematic differences exist in ECG intervals measured by current generation digital electrocardiographs from different manufacturers and whether differences, if present, are dependent on the degree of abnormality of the selected ECGs.

METHODS

Measurements of RR interval, PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval were made blindly by 4 major manufacturers of digital electrocardiographs used in the United States from 600 XML files of ECG tracings stored in the US FDA ECG warehouse and released for the purpose of this study by the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. Included were 3 groups based on expected QT interval and degree of repolarization abnormality, comprising 200 ECGs each from (1) placebo or baseline study period in normal subjects during thorough QT studies, (2) peak moxifloxacin effect in otherwise normal subjects during thorough QT studies, and (3) patients with genotyped variants of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS).

RESULTS

Differences of means between manufacturers were generally small in the normal and moxifloxacin subjects, but in the LQTS patients, differences of means ranged from 2.0 to 14.0 ms for QRS duration and from 0.8 to 18.1 ms for the QT interval. Mean absolute differences between algorithms were similar for QRS duration and QT intervals in the normal and in the moxifloxacin subjects (mean ≤6 ms) but were significantly larger in patients with LQTS.

CONCLUSIONS

Small but statistically significant group differences in mean interval and duration measurements and means of individual absolute differences exist among automated algorithms of widely used, current generation digital electrocardiographs. Measurement differences, including QRS duration and the QT interval, are greatest for the most abnormal ECGs.

摘要

背景与目的

临床医生在为个体患者诊断时,以及研究人员在进行人群研究时,广泛使用心电图(ECG)间期的自动测量。我们研究了不同制造商生产的当前代数字心电图机所测量的 ECG 间期是否存在临床显著的系统差异,以及如果存在差异,这些差异是否取决于所选 ECG 的异常程度。

方法

来自美国的 4 家主要数字心电图机制造商对存储在美国 FDA ECG 仓库中的 600 个 XML 文件的 ECG 轨迹进行了 RR 间期、PR 间期、QRS 持续时间和 QT 间期的盲测。本研究纳入了 3 组,基于预期 QT 间期和复极异常程度,每组包括 200 份 ECG:(1)在全面 QT 研究中正常受试者的安慰剂或基线研究期间;(2)在全面 QT 研究中正常受试者的莫西沙星峰值效应期间;(3)经基因分型的先天性长 QT 综合征(LQTS)患者。

结果

在正常和莫西沙星受试者中,制造商之间的均值差异通常较小,但在 LQTS 患者中,QRS 持续时间的均值差异范围为 2.0 至 14.0 ms,QT 间期的均值差异范围为 0.8 至 18.1 ms。在正常和莫西沙星受试者中,QRS 持续时间和 QT 间期的算法间平均绝对差异相似(平均≤6 ms),但在 LQTS 患者中差异明显更大。

结论

在广泛使用的当前代数字心电图机的自动算法中,存在小但具有统计学意义的组间平均间期和持续时间测量差异以及个体绝对差异的平均值。测量差异(包括 QRS 持续时间和 QT 间期)在最异常的 ECG 中最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验