Hnatkova Katerina, Gang Yi, Batchvarov Velislav N, Malik Marek
Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St. George's University of London, London, UK.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;29(11):1277-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00532.x.
The costs of clinical investigations of drug-induced QT interval prolongation are mainly related to manual processing of electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. Potentially, however, these costs can be decreased by automatic ECG measurement. To investigate the improvements in measurement accuracy of the modern ECG equipment, this study investigated QT interval measurement by the "old" and "new" versions of the 12SL ECG algorithm by GE Healthcare (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and compared the results to carefully validated and reconciled manual measurements. The investigation used two sets (A and B) of ECG recordings that originated from large clinical studies. Sets A and B consisted of 15,194, and 29,866 10-second ECG recordings, respectively. All the recordings were obtained with GE Healthcare recorders and were available in digital format compatible with ECG processing software by GE Healthcare. The two sets of recordings differed significantly in ECG quality with set B being substantially more noise polluted. Compared to careful manual QT interval readings in recording set A, the errors of the automatic QT interval measurement were (mean +/- SD) +3.95 +/- 5.50 ms, and +0.51 +/- 12.41 ms for the "new" and "old" 12SL algorithm, respectively. In recording set B, these numbers were +2.41 +/- 9.47 ms, and -0.17 +/- 14.89 ms, respectively (both differences were highly statistically significant, P < 0.000001). In recording set A, 95.9% and 76.6% of ECGs were measured automatically within 10 ms of the manual measurement by the "new" and "old" versions of the 12SL algorithm, In recording set B, these numbers were 83.9% and 59.5%. The errors made by the "new" and "old" version of 12SL algorithm were practically independent each of the other (correlation coefficients of 0.031 and 0.281 in recording sets A and B, respectively). The study shows that (a) compared to the "old" version of the 12SL algorithm, the QT interval measurement by the "new" version implemented in the most recent ECG equipment by GE Healthcare is significantly better, and (b) the precision of automatic measurement by the 12SL algorithm is substantially dependent on the quality of processed ECG recordings. The improved accuracy of the "new" 12SL algorithm makes it feasible to use modern ECG equipment without any manual intervention in selected parts of drug-development program.
药物诱导的QT间期延长的临床研究成本主要与心电图(ECG)记录的人工处理有关。然而,通过自动ECG测量可能会降低这些成本。为了研究现代ECG设备测量准确性的提高情况,本研究通过通用电气医疗集团(美国威斯康星州密尔沃基)的12SL ECG算法的“旧”版和“新”版来研究QT间期测量,并将结果与经过仔细验证和核对的人工测量结果进行比较。该研究使用了两组(A组和B组)来自大型临床研究的ECG记录。A组和B组分别由15194份和29866份10秒的ECG记录组成。所有记录均使用通用电气医疗集团的记录仪获得,并以与通用电气医疗集团的ECG处理软件兼容的数字格式提供。两组记录在ECG质量上有显著差异,B组的噪声污染更严重。与记录集A中仔细的人工QT间期读数相比,自动QT间期测量的误差分别为(平均值±标准差)“新”版和“旧”版12SL算法的+3.95±5.50毫秒和+0.51±12.41毫秒。在记录集B中,这些数字分别为+2.41±9.47毫秒和-0.17±14.89毫秒(两者差异均具有高度统计学意义,P<0.000001)。在记录集A中,12SL算法“新”版和“旧”版自动测量的ECG中有95.9%和76.6%在人工测量的10毫秒内。在记录集B中,这些数字分别为83.9%和59.5%。12SL算法“新”版和“旧”版产生的误差实际上相互独立(记录集A和B中的相关系数分别为0.031和0.281)。该研究表明:(a)与12SL算法的“旧”版相比,通用电气医疗集团最新ECG设备中实施的“新”版QT间期测量明显更好;(b)12SL算法自动测量的精度在很大程度上取决于处理后的ECG记录的质量。“新”版12SL算法提高的准确性使得在药物开发计划的选定部分无需任何人工干预就可以使用现代ECG设备。