• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管测压、体位和食管裂孔疝。

Esophageal pressure topography, body position, and hiatal hernia.

机构信息

*University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine and VAMC, Iowa City, IA †Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;48(3):224-30. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000057.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000057
PMID:24440930
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Whether body position affects lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function and detection of hiatal hernia is unknown. Moreover, the yield of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) when compared with endoscopy for detection of hiatal hernia is unclear.

AIM

The aims of this study were to examine (a) the effects of body position (standing vs. supine) on LES function, and (b) to determine the diagnostic yield of HREPT and endoscopy for detection of hiatal hernia.

METHODS

A total of 50 subjects underwent both HREPT and endoscopy. The manometric/topographic changes of LES were examined in both supine and standing positions. Endoscopy assessed presence and length of hiatal hernia. Diagnostic agreement was compared between HREPT and endoscopy.

RESULTS

The resting LES pressure was higher (P=0.0001), its mean length was longer (P=0.0003), and length of high-pressure zone was longer (P=0.0001) in the standing position compared with the supine position. HREPT detected twice as many subjects with hiatal hernia in standing (P=0.0001) compared with supine position or endoscopy with significant new diagnostic information (79%). Endoscopy detection rate (34%) was similar to supine manometry with good diagnostic agreement (77%) between HREPT and endoscopy. Hiatal hernia length was longer (P=0.0001) with HREPT in standing position compared with endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Body position significantly affects in the LES function and its measurements. HREPT when performed on standing position offers the best yield for detection of hiatal hernia and is superior to endoscopy or supine manometry.

摘要

简介

目前尚不清楚体位变化是否会影响食管下括约肌(LES)功能和食管裂孔疝(hiatal hernia)的检出,也不清楚高分辨率食管测压(HREPT)在检测食管裂孔疝方面与内镜检查的效果差异。

目的

本研究旨在探讨(a)体位(站立位与仰卧位)变化对 LES 功能的影响,以及(b)HREPT 和内镜检查检测食管裂孔疝的诊断效能。

方法

共 50 例受试者同时接受 HREPT 和内镜检查。检测并比较了 LES 在仰卧位和站立位时的测压/测压地形图变化。内镜评估食管裂孔疝的存在和长度。比较了 HREPT 和内镜检查的诊断一致性。

结果

与仰卧位相比,站立位时 LES 静息压更高(P=0.0001),平均长度更长(P=0.0003),高压区长度更长(P=0.0001)。与仰卧位或内镜检查相比,HREPT 在站立位时能检出两倍以上的食管裂孔疝患者,且有显著的新诊断信息(79%)(P=0.0001)。内镜检查的检出率(34%)与仰卧位测压相似,HREPT 与内镜检查的诊断一致性较好(77%)。与内镜检查相比,站立位 HREPT 检测到的食管裂孔疝长度更长(P=0.0001)。

结论

体位明显影响 LES 功能及其检测结果。站立位 HREPT 检测食管裂孔疝的效果最好,优于内镜检查或仰卧位测压。

相似文献

1
Esophageal pressure topography, body position, and hiatal hernia.食管测压、体位和食管裂孔疝。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;48(3):224-30. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000057.
2
Nocturnal and daytime esophageal acid exposure in normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients with reflux symptoms.正常体重、超重和肥胖的反流症状患者夜间和日间食管酸暴露情况。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;26(1):6-10. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328365c3cb.
3
Influence of everyday bolus consistencies in different body positions on high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) parameters.不同体位下日常推注食物黏稠度对高分辨率食管压力地形图(HREPT)参数的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Apr;28(3):246-52. doi: 10.1111/dote.12186. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
4
The effect of position on esophageal structure and function determined with solid-state high-resolution manometry.体位对食管结构和功能的影响:采用固态高分辨率测压法测定
J Dig Dis. 2015 Jun;16(6):350-6. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12256.
5
Accuracy of hiatal hernia detection with esophageal high-resolution manometry.食管高分辨率测压法检测食管裂孔疝的准确性
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):293-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12507.
6
Swallow-induced esophageal shortening in patients without hiatal hernia is associated with gastroesophageal reflux.无食管裂孔疝患者吞咽引起的食管缩短与胃食管反流有关。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 May 1;31(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox152.
7
Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy.诊断Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝:高分辨率测压法与内镜检查的对比。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jan;26(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01314.x. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Identification of hiatal hernia by esophageal manometry: is it reliable?通过食管测压法识别食管裂孔疝:它可靠吗?
Dis Esophagus. 2005;18(5):316-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2005.00506.x.
9
A new era in esophageal diagnostics: the image-based paradigm of high-resolution manometry.食管诊断的新时代:基于图像的高分辨率测压范式
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jun;208(6):1035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.049. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
10
The crura and crura-sphincter pressure dynamics in patients with isolated upright and isolated supine reflux.单纯直立位反流和单纯仰卧位反流患者的脚和脚-括约肌压力动态变化
Am Surg. 2001 Dec;67(12):1150-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.犬类和人类吞咽障碍与胃食管反流诊断的比较评估
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jun 9;9:889331. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.889331. eCollection 2022.
2
Accuracy of hiatal hernia diagnosis in bariatric patients: Preoperative endoscopy intraoperative reference.肥胖症患者食管裂孔疝诊断的准确性:术前内镜检查与术中参考
JGH Open. 2020 Jul 30;4(6):1074-1078. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12388. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.
ACG 临床指南:食管生理测试的临床应用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;115(9):1412-1428. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000734.
4
Effect of Body Position on High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Variables and Final Manometric Diagnosis.体位对高分辨率食管测压变量及最终测压诊断的影响
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Jul 30;26(3):335-343. doi: 10.5056/jnm20010.