• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A review of functional capacity evaluation practice.

作者信息

Gibson L, Strong J

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Work. 1997;9(1):3-11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-1997-9102.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-1997-9102
PMID:24441920
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the implementation of recommendations from a prior review of functional capacity evaluation practice in a regionalised rehabilitation service. The evaluation considered the acceptance of the recommendations and the current level of consistency of approach in practice.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was qualitative in nature, using a descriptive survey and a focus group. Participants were occupational therapists of a major rehabilitation provider in Queensland, Australia. Eighteen of 48 therapists (38%) responded to the questionnaire. Eight therapists participated in the focus group.

RESULTS

The results indicated some acceptance of the recommendations for functional capacity evaluation in areas such as procedure, reporting, equipment and model of evaluation. Further research into the reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation was indicated.

DISCUSSION

The low response rate did not allow conclusive results. However, the findings provided some evidence of consistency in functional capacity evaluation practice. The results are discussed in relation to current issues in functional capacity evaluation practice.

摘要

相似文献

1
A review of functional capacity evaluation practice.
Work. 1997;9(1):3-11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-1997-9102.
2
Workplace assessments and functional capacity evaluations: current beliefs of therapists in Australia.工作场所评估与功能能力评估:澳大利亚治疗师的当前看法
Work. 2003;20(3):225-36.
3
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
4
The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.在功能能力评估中确定搬运用力水平的可靠性。
Work. 2002;18(1):23-7.
5
Workplace assessments and functional capacity evaluations: current practices of therapists in Australia.工作场所评估与功能能力评估:澳大利亚治疗师的当前实践
Work. 2002;18(1):51-66.
6
Positioning occupational therapy as a discipline on the research continuum: results of a cross-sectional survey of research experience.将职业治疗定位为研究连续体上的一门学科:一项关于研究经验的横断面调查结果
Aust Occup Ther J. 2013 Aug;60(4):241-51. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12057. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
7
The clinical utility of functional capacity evaluations: the opinion of health professionals working within occupational rehabilitation.功能能力评估的临床效用:职业康复领域健康专业人员的观点。
Work. 2009;33(3):231-9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0871.
8
Evaluating an online occupational therapy community of practice and its role in supporting occupational therapy practice.评估一个在线职业治疗实践社区及其在支持职业治疗实践中的作用。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2011 Oct;58(5):337-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00954.x.
9
Expert review of an approach to functional capacity evaluation.
Work. 2002;19(3):231-42.
10
Use of Functional Capacity Evaluations by rehabilitation providers in NSW.新南威尔士州康复服务提供者对功能能力评估的使用情况。
Work. 2006;26(3):287-95.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantification of the safe maximal lift in functional capacity evaluations: comparison of muscle recruitment using SEMG and therapist observation.功能能力评估中安全最大提升量的量化:使用表面肌电图和治疗师观察比较肌肉募集情况。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):419-27. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9407-8.
2
The assessment of function: How is it measured? A clinical perspective.功能评估:如何进行测量?临床视角。
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 May;19(2):91-9. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12973307659546.
3
Responsiveness of the physical work performance evaluation, a functional capacity evaluation, in patients with low back pain.
J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Mar;18(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9118-8. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
4
Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain.功能能力评估中的安全问题:一项评估慢性背痛患者新方法试验的结果
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Jun;15(2):237-51. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-1222-z.
5
Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Nov;77(8):527-37. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
6
The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation.
J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Jun;14(2):119-29. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000018328.35521.e8.
7
Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker's compensation environment.在工伤赔偿环境中进行的运动物理功能能力评估的结构效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2003 Dec;13(4):287-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1026276822721.