Suppr超能文献

唑来膦酸预防痛风石性痛风中的骨侵蚀:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Zoledronate for prevention of bone erosion in tophaceous gout: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, , Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1044-51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205036. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The osteoclast has been implicated in development of bone erosion in gout. The aim of this study was to determine whether zoledronate, a potent antiosteoclast drug, influences bone erosion in people with tophaceous gout.

METHODS

This was a 2-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 100 people with tophaceous gout. Participants were randomised to annual administration of 5 mg intravenous zoledronate or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in the foot CT bone erosion score from baseline. Secondary endpoint was change in plain radiographic damage scores. Other endpoints were change in bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers and the OMERACT-endorsed core domains for chronic gout studies.

RESULTS

There was no change in CT erosion scores over 2 years, and no difference between the two treatment groups at Year 1 or 2 (p(treat)=0.10, p(time)=0.47, p(treat*time)=0.23). Similarly, there was no change in plain radiographic scores over 2 years, and no difference between the two groups at Year 1 or 2. By contrast, zoledronate increased spine, neck of femur, total hip and total body BMD. Zoledronate therapy also reduced the bone turnover markers P1NP and β-CTX compared with placebo. There was no difference between treatment groups in OMERACT-endorsed core domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in BMD and suppression of bone turnover markers, antiosteoclast therapy with zoledronate did not influence bone erosion in people with tophaceous gout. These findings suggest a disconnect between responses in the healthy skeleton and at sites of focal bone erosion in tophaceous gout.

摘要

目的

破骨细胞被认为与痛风患者的骨侵蚀发展有关。本研究旨在确定唑来膦酸(一种强效的抗破骨细胞药物)是否会影响痛风石患者的骨侵蚀。

方法

这是一项为期 2 年、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 100 例痛风石患者试验。参与者被随机分配接受每年一次静脉注射 5mg 唑来膦酸或安慰剂。主要终点是从基线开始足部 CT 骨侵蚀评分的变化。次要终点是平片损伤评分的变化。其他终点是骨密度(BMD)、骨转换标志物和 OMERACT 认可的慢性痛风研究核心领域的变化。

结果

在 2 年内 CT 侵蚀评分没有变化,两组在第 1 年或第 2 年之间没有差异(p(treat)=0.10,p(time)=0.47,p(treat*time)=0.23)。同样,在 2 年内平片评分没有变化,两组在第 1 年或第 2 年之间也没有差异。相比之下,唑来膦酸增加了脊柱、股骨颈、全髋和全身体 BMD。唑来膦酸治疗还降低了与安慰剂相比的 P1NP 和β-CTX 骨转换标志物。在 OMERACT 认可的核心领域,两组之间没有差异。

结论

尽管 BMD 改善和骨转换标志物抑制,但抗破骨细胞治疗用唑来膦酸并未影响痛风石患者的骨侵蚀。这些发现表明,在健康骨骼和痛风石局部骨侵蚀部位的反应之间存在脱节。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验