• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打开黑匣子:由一级路径和出站护士呼叫系统组成的肿瘤管理项目的影响。

Opening the black box: the impact of an oncology management program consisting of level I pathways and an outbound nurse call system.

机构信息

US Oncology Network, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; and Aetna, Hillsborough, NJ.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jan;10(1):63-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001210.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2013.001210
PMID:24443735
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Innovent Oncology Program aims to improve the value of cancer care delivered to patients. McKesson Specialty Health and Texas Oncology (TXO) collaborated with Aetna to launch a pilot program. The study objectives were to evaluate the impact of Innovent on Level I Pathway compliance, implement the Patient Support Services program, and measure the rate and costs associated with chemotherapy-related emergency room (ER) visits and hospital admissions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized evaluation of patients enrolled in Innovent from June 1, 2010, through May 31, 2012. Data from the iKnowMed electronic health record, the McKesson Specialty Health financial data warehouse, and Aetna claims data warehouse were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were included and stratified according to disease and age groups; 76% of ordered regimens were on pathway; 24% were off pathway. Pathway adherence improved from TXO baseline adherence of 63%. Of the 221 patients, 81% enrolled in PSS. Within the breast, colorectal, and lung cancer groups, 14% and 24% of patients had an ER visit and in-patient admission (IPA; baseline) versus 10% and 18% in Innovent, respectively; average in-patient days decreased from 2.1 to 1.2 days, respectively. Total savings combined for the program was $506,481.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of Innovent positively affected patient care in several ways: Fewer ER visits and IPAs occurred, in-patient days decreased, cancer-related use costs were reduced, and on-pathway adherence increased.

摘要

目的

创新肿瘤学计划旨在提高为患者提供的癌症护理的价值。 McKesson 特种健康和德克萨斯肿瘤学(TXO)与安泰合作推出了一个试点计划。研究目的是评估 Innovent 对一级途径依从性的影响,实施患者支持服务计划,并衡量与化疗相关的急诊室(ER)就诊和住院相关的发生率和费用。

患者和方法

这是一项对 2010 年 6 月 1 日至 2012 年 5 月 31 日期间参加 Innovent 的患者进行的前瞻性、非随机评估。分析了 iKnowMed 电子健康记录、McKesson 特种健康财务数据仓库和安泰理赔数据仓库的数据。

结果

共纳入 221 例患者,并根据疾病和年龄组进行分层;76%的规定方案符合途径;24%不符合途径。途径依从性从 TXO 的基线依从性 63%提高。在 221 例患者中,81%的患者参加了 PSS。在乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌组中,14%和 24%的患者有 ER 就诊和住院(IPA;基线),而 Innovent 组分别为 10%和 18%;平均住院天数分别从 2.1 天减少到 1.2 天。该计划的总节省额为 506481 美元。

结论

Innovent 的实施在多个方面对患者护理产生了积极影响:急诊就诊和 IPA 减少,住院天数减少,癌症相关使用费用降低,符合途径的依从性提高。

相似文献

1
Opening the black box: the impact of an oncology management program consisting of level I pathways and an outbound nurse call system.打开黑匣子:由一级路径和出站护士呼叫系统组成的肿瘤管理项目的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jan;10(1):63-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001210.
2
Three-Year Results of a Medicare Advantage Cancer Management Program.医疗保险优势癌症管理计划的三年结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Apr;14(4):e229-e237. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00091. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Reducing Cancer Costs Through Symptom Management and Triage Pathways.通过症状管理和分诊途径降低癌症成本。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Feb;15(2):e91-e97. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00082. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy.一项电话护理管理策略的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 23;363(13):1245-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0902321.
5
Michigan Oncology Medical Home Demonstration Project: first-year results.密歇根肿瘤医疗之家示范项目:第一年的结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):294-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001365. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
6
Community Oncology Medical Homes: Physician-Driven Change to Improve Patient Care and Reduce Costs.社区肿瘤医疗之家:由医生推动的变革以改善患者护理并降低成本。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Nov;11(6):462-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005256. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
7
An economic analysis of a nurse-led telephone triage service.一项由护士主导的电话分诊服务的经济分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Sep;20(6):330-8. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14545430. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
8
Cost variation and savings opportunities in the Oncology Care Model.肿瘤护理模式中的成本变化和节约机会。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Dec;24(12):618-623.
9
Comparison of two different models of anticoagulation management services with usual medical care.两种不同抗凝管理服务模式与常规医疗护理的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Apr;30(4):330-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.4.330.
10
The Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) study: health-care utilization and cost findings.发作性睡病疾病负担(BOND)研究:医疗保健利用情况及成本研究结果。
Sleep Med. 2014 May;15(5):522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Care Cost Reductions with Machine Learning-Directed Evaluations during Radiation Therapy - An Economic Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Study.放射治疗期间通过机器学习指导评估降低医疗成本——一项随机对照研究的经济分析
NEJM AI. 2024 Apr;1(4). doi: 10.1056/aioa2300118. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Support in Computed Tomography-Based Lung Cancer Screening.基于计算机断层扫描的肺癌筛查中人工智能支持的成本效益
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;14(7):1729. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071729.
3
Cost-Savings Analysis of an Individualized Exercise Oncology Program in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Control Trial.
个体化运动肿瘤学方案在早期乳腺癌幸存者中的成本-效益分析:一项随机临床对照试验。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jul;18(7):e1170-e1180. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00690. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review.测量接受系统抗癌治疗的癌症患者非计划性急诊就诊发生率的方法学研究:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 21;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01555-3.
5
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer initiating first-line treatment in the US community oncology setting: a real-world retrospective observational study.在美国社区肿瘤学环境中,接受一线治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:一项真实世界的回顾性观察研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;147(3):671-690. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03414-4. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
A scoping review of clinical decision support tools that generate new knowledge to support decision making in real time.实时决策支持中生成新知识的临床决策支持工具的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1968-1976. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa200.
7
Rethinking clinical oncology drug research in an era of value-based cancer care: A role for chemotherapy pathways.重新思考基于价值的癌症护理时代的临床肿瘤药物研究:化疗途径的作用。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(15):5306-5311. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3193. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Outcome measures for oncology alternative payment models: practical considerations and recommendations.肿瘤学替代支付模式的结果指标:实际考量与建议
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Dec 1;25(12):e403-e409.
9
Socio-demographic and disease related characteristics associated with unplanned emergency department visits by cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.社会人口学和与癌症患者非计划性急诊就诊相关的疾病特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4509-z.
10
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model Halfway Through: Perspectives from Diverse Participants.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心肿瘤治疗模式进行过半:来自不同参与者的观点。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):764-771. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz072.