• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧入路微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术能否达到间接对侧减压?66 例 MRI 分析的初步报告。

Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression? A preliminary report of 66 MRI analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bumin Hospital, Pusan, Korea.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1144-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3192-3. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-014-3192-3
PMID:24445606
Abstract

PURPOSE

Few studies have measured the amount of indirect decompression at the contralateral neural foramen after unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF). This study examined the amount of intraoperative indirect decompression at the contralateral neural foramen after a unilateral-approach MITLIF in patients with bilateral foraminal stenosis.

METHODS

From February 2009 to October 2012, 66 consecutive patients with bilateral foraminal stenosis underwent unilateral-approach MITLIF and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Direct decompression was performed at the central canal and approach-side neural foramen, while indirect decompression using cage distraction was pursued at the contralateral neural foramen. Qualitative parameters of the central canal (dural sac morphology) and neural foramen (foramen morphology) were analyzed using pre- and post-operative MRI. Quantitative measurement on the central canal (dural sac cross-sectional area) and neural foramen (foramen height and width) were also measured.

RESULTS

A total of 69 intervertebral levels in the 66 patients were analyzed. Qualitative parameters of the central canal and contralateral neural foramen improved significantly after unilateral-approach MITLIF (both P < 0.001). The mean dural sac cross-sectional area increased from 51.1 ± 28.8 to 84.8 ± 30.2 mm(2) (P < 0.001). The mean preoperative contralateral foramen height, maximum foramen width, and minimum foramen width were 11.8 ± 2.0, 4.9 ± 1.5, and 1.5 ± 0.7 mm, respectively, and these values increased postoperatively to 14.7 ± 2.5, 6.5 ± 1.8, and 2.4 ± 1.0 mm, respectively (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative and qualitative parameters of the central canal and contralateral neural foramen increased significantly after unilateral-approach MITLIF.

摘要

目的

单侧入路微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MITLIF)后,很少有研究测量对侧神经孔的间接减压量。本研究检测了双侧椎间孔狭窄患者单侧入路 MITLIF 术后对侧神经孔的术中间接减压量。

方法

2009 年 2 月至 2012 年 10 月,66 例双侧椎间孔狭窄患者接受单侧入路 MITLIF 及术后磁共振成像(MRI)检查。中央管和入路侧神经孔行直接减压,对侧神经孔采用椎间笼撑开行间接减压。使用术前和术后 MRI 分析中央管(硬脊膜囊形态)和神经孔(神经孔形态)的定性参数。还对中央管(硬脊膜囊横截面积)和神经孔(神经孔高度和宽度)进行了定量测量。

结果

共分析了 66 例患者的 69 个节段。单侧入路 MITLIF 后,中央管和对侧神经孔的定性参数均显著改善(均 P < 0.001)。硬脊膜囊横截面积从 51.1 ± 28.8 增至 84.8 ± 30.2 mm(2)(P < 0.001)。术前对侧神经孔高度、最大神经孔宽度和最小神经孔宽度分别为 11.8 ± 2.0、4.9 ± 1.5 和 1.5 ± 0.7 mm,术后分别增至 14.7 ± 2.5、6.5 ± 1.8 和 2.4 ± 1.0 mm(均 P < 0.001)。

结论

单侧入路 MITLIF 后,中央管和对侧神经孔的定量和定性参数均显著增加。

相似文献

1
Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression? A preliminary report of 66 MRI analysis.单侧入路微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术能否达到间接对侧减压?66 例 MRI 分析的初步报告。
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1144-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3192-3. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
2
Unilateral approach for bilateral foramen decompression in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术中双侧孔减压的单侧入路。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;82(5):891-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后腰椎中央椎管狭窄减压
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Oct 1;34(8):E439-E449. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001192.
4
Effect of preoperative contralateral foramen stenosis on contralateral root symptoms after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a ambispective cohort study.单侧经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后对侧椎间孔狭窄对侧神经根症状的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 14;24(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06381-2.
5
Morphologic Changes of Intervertebral Foramen After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Radiographic and Clinical Study.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后椎间孔形态学变化:一项影像学和临床研究。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e151-e159. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.143. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.微创或开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术作为既往行开放椎间盘切除术和腰椎减压术治疗的患者的翻修手术。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):623-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1578-4. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.微创经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术后腰椎管间接减压的评估:影像学及疗效分析
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;54(5-6):201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286334. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
Analysis of risk factors for contralateral symptomatic foraminal stenosis after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.分析单侧经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后对侧症状性侧隐窝狭窄的危险因素。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1815-1826. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05826-6. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
Clinical and radiological results of indirect decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion in central spinal canal stenosis.中央型椎管狭窄症前路腰椎间融合术后间接减压的临床和影像学结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jan 15;34(4):564-572. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.SPINE191335. Print 2021 Apr 1.
10
Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.直接减压术后 MRI 随访结果:至少 2 年的随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1411-E1418. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003180.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Endoscopic Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decompression (Endo-ULBD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in Managing Multi-Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Early Outcomes.内镜下单侧椎板切除术治疗双侧减压(Endo-ULBD)与后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较:技术与早期疗效
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1620-1632. doi: 10.1111/os.70013. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Can unilateral-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion replace the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure for lumbar degenerative disc diseases?: a single center matched case-control mid-term outcome study.对于腰椎间盘退变疾病,单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术能否取代传统经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术?:一项单中心配对病例对照中期结果研究。
Asian Spine J. 2024 Dec;18(6):846-855. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0230. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.前路腰椎椎间融合术后测量指数节段和上位节段神经根管矢状径的前瞻性研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Mar;5(1):49-54. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.49. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
2
The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.X 型棘突间植入物对老年腰椎管狭窄症患者椎间孔、节段椎管长度和椎间盘间隙的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):400-10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2021-1. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
3
Effects of "fixation-fusion" sequence of lumbar surgery on surgical outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.腰椎手术“固定-融合”序列对腰椎管狭窄症患者手术结局的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 1;24(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07052-y.
4
Comparison between OLIF and MISTLIF in degenerative lumbar stenosis: an age-, sex-, and segment-matched cohort study.OLIF 与 MISTLIF 治疗退变性腰椎狭窄症的比较:一项年龄、性别和节段匹配的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 14;13(1):13188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40533-7.
5
Spinal Canal Remodeling and Indirect Decompression of Contralateral Foraminal Stenosis After Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.内镜下经椎间孔腰椎后外侧融合术后椎管重塑及对侧椎间孔狭窄的间接减压
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):99-109. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346132.066. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
SPINE: High heterogeneity and no significant differences in clinical outcomes of endoscopic foraminotomy vs fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a meta-analysis.脊柱:内镜下椎间孔切开术与腰椎椎间孔狭窄融合术临床疗效的高度异质性及无显著差异:一项荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Feb 21;8(2):73-89. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0093.
7
Contralateral radiculopathy after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: causes and prevention.单侧经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后对侧神经根病:病因与预防。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Aug;49(8):3000605211037475. doi: 10.1177/03000605211037475.
8
[Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between two approaches in treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis].两种入路微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):807-813. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903096.
9
Morphological changes of contralateral intervertebral foramen induced by cage insertion orientation after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器植入方向对侧椎间孔的形态学变化
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Mar 13;14(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1121-1.
10
Risk factor of contralateral radiculopathy following microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.显微内镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后对侧神经根病的危险因素
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1925-1932. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5417-8. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? A magnetic resonance imaging study.
脊柱狭窄评估是否依赖于层面方位?一项磁共振成像研究。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S760-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1857-8. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:技术与疗效的综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S294-301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022ddc.
5
Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation.探讨经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后融合 cage 后向迁移的危险因素:单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的一个潜在局限性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):381-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09590.
6
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
7
Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间植入物(X Stop、Wallis、Diam):放射学参数与临床结果之间存在相关性吗?
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1494-503. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1081-y. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
8
Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis.腰椎椎间孔狭窄症椎弓根内部分椎弓根切除术的临床结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):324-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318149e681.
9
Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis--a surgeon's perspective.磁共振成像在腰椎椎间孔狭窄症诊断中的评估——外科医生的视角
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jun;19(4):249-56. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000203942.81050.c8.
10
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.微创腰椎融合术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E.