Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, , 43 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 20;369(1637):20120463. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0463. Print 2014 Mar 5.
Psychologists have long distinguished between prospective and retrospective timing to highlight the difference between our sense of duration during an experience in passing and our sense of duration in hindsight. Humans and other animals use prospective timing in the seconds-to-minutes range in order to learn durations, and can organize their behaviour based upon this knowledge when they know that duration information will be important ahead of time. By contrast, when durations are estimated after the fact, thus precluding the subject from consciously attending to temporal information, duration information must be extracted from other memory representations. The accumulated evidence from prospective timing research has generally led to the hippocampus (HPC) being casted in a supporting role with prefrontal-striatal, cortical or cerebellar circuits playing the lead. Here, I review findings from the animal and human literature that have led to this conclusion and consider that the contribution of the HPC to duration memory is understated because we have little understanding about how we remember duration.
心理学家长期以来一直区分前瞻性和回溯性时间,以突出我们在体验过程中对持续时间的感觉与事后对持续时间的感觉之间的差异。人类和其他动物在几秒钟到几分钟的范围内使用前瞻性时间来学习持续时间,并且当他们知道持续时间信息将提前变得重要时,可以根据该知识组织自己的行为。相比之下,当在事实发生后估计持续时间时,从而使主体无法有意识地关注时间信息,就必须从其他记忆表示中提取持续时间信息。前瞻性时间研究的累积证据通常导致海马体(HPC)被置于辅助角色,而前额叶-纹状体、皮质或小脑回路则扮演主导角色。在这里,我回顾了导致这一结论的动物和人类文献中的发现,并认为 HPC 对持续时间记忆的贡献被低估了,因为我们对我们如何记忆持续时间几乎没有了解。