Bordignon Stefano, Fürnkranz Alexander, Dugo Daniela, Perrotta Laura, Gunawardene Melanie, Bode Frank, Klemt Anne, Nowak Bernd, Schulte-Hahn Britta, Schmidt Boris, Chun K R Julian
CCB-Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Markuskrankenahus, Wilhelm-Epstein Street 4, 60431 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Medizinische Klinik II, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lübeck.
Europace. 2014 Jul;16(7):987-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut400. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
Recently, a novel second-generation (G2) cryoballoon (CB) was introduced. Comparative analysis of lesion formation in terms of myocardial biomarker release [first-generation CB (G1) vs. G2] has not been studied. To compare myocardial biomarker release using the 28 mm G1 vs. G2 CB.
In patients (patients) treated with the simplified single big CB (SBCB) strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), myocardial biomarkers [troponin T (TnT), creatine kinase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)] were measured at 12, 24, and 48 h after PVI. Two groups were defined: Group 1 (G1; freezing time: 300 s), Group 2 (G2; freezing time: 240 s). Mean biomarker peak values were compared. To correct for between-group differences in cumulative freezing time, an index calculated as peak biomarker release divided by cumulative freezing time was calculated. Sixty-six CB PVI procedures (G1: 33 patients, G2: 33 patients) were analysed. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all the patients using the simplified SBCB technique only. Mean freezing time (51 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 6 min, P < 0.01) was significantly shorter in G2. All biomarker levels tended to be higher in G2 vs. G1. The indexed biomarkers values were significantly higher in G2: TnT: 18.8 ± 8.5 vs. 32.3 ± 13.6 pg/L/min (P < 0.01); creatinephosphokinase: 6.7 ± 2.7 vs. 11.7 ± 3.9 U/L/min (P < 0.01); LDH: 5.2 ± 1.0 vs. 9.1 ± 2.7 U/L/min (P < 0.01). On a 6-month follow-up (180 days), G2 revealed a significantly higher success rate (20/33 vs. 28/33; P = 0.027).
Pulmonary vein isolation using the G2 CB increased the myocardial biomarker release index and is linked to a significantly improved 6 months success rate.
最近,一种新型第二代(G2)冷冻球囊(CB)问世。尚未对基于心肌生物标志物释放情况(第一代CB(G1)与G2对比)的损伤形成进行比较分析。比较使用28mm G1与G2 CB时心肌生物标志物的释放情况。
在采用简化单一大CB(SBCB)策略进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗的患者中,于PVI后12、24和48小时测量心肌生物标志物[肌钙蛋白T(TnT)、肌酸激酶、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)]。定义了两组:第1组(G1;冷冻时间:300秒),第2组(G2;冷冻时间:240秒)。比较生物标志物的平均峰值。为校正两组累积冷冻时间的差异,计算了一个指标,即生物标志物峰值释放量除以累积冷冻时间。分析了66例CB PVI手术(G1:33例患者,G2:33例患者)。所有患者仅使用简化SBCB技术即实现了肺静脉隔离。G2组的平均冷冻时间显著更短(51±10对33±6分钟,P<0.01)。与G1组相比,G2组所有生物标志物水平均有升高趋势。G2组的生物标志物指数值显著更高:TnT:18.8±8.5对32.3±13.6 pg/L/分钟(P<0.01);肌酸磷酸激酶:6.7±2.7对11.7±3.9 U/L/分钟(P<0.01);LDH:5.2±1.0对9.1±2.7 U/L/分钟(P<0.01)。在6个月随访(180天)时,G2组显示成功率显著更高(20/33对28/33;P = 0.027)。
使用G2 CB进行肺静脉隔离增加了心肌生物标志物释放指数,并与6个月成功率显著提高相关。