Suppr超能文献

使用单根导管的高功率短时间消融指数指导下的肺静脉隔离方案。

High-power short-duration ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation protocol using a single catheter.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Dec;65(3):633-642. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01226-9. Epub 2022 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly performed electrophysiological procedure. To improve healthcare utilization, we aimed to compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of a minimalistic, streamlined single catheter ablation approach using a high-power short-duration ablation index-guided protocol (HPSD) vs. a control single-catheter protocol (SP).

METHODS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single transseptal puncture without a multipolar mapping catheter was performed in 91 patients. Left atrial mapping was performed with the ablation catheter, only. Pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. Procedural characteristics and success rates were compared using HPSD (n = 34) vs. a control (n = 57) ablation protocol. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

Using the HPSD protocol the median procedure and RF ablation time were significantly shorter compared to the SP, 84 (IQR 76-100) vs. 118 min (IQR 104-141) and 1036 (898-1184) vs. 1949s (IQR 1693-2261), respectively, p < .001 for all. First-pass PVI was achieved using the HPSD protocol in 88% and using the SP in 87% of patients, p = 1.0. No procedural complications were observed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels were significantly higher in patients using the HPSD protocol compared to the SP. At 12 months follow-up, 87% patients remained free from AF with no differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A minimalistic, HPSD ablation index-guided PVI with a single-catheter approach is very efficient, safe, and associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.

摘要

背景

房颤(AF)的导管消融是最常进行的电生理程序。为了改善医疗保健的利用,我们旨在比较极简、流线型的单导管消融方法的疗效、效率和安全性,该方法使用高功率短持续时间消融指数指导方案(HPSD)与对照单导管方案(SP)。

方法

在 91 名患者中进行了单次经房间隔穿刺而不使用多极标测导管的肺静脉隔离(PVI)。仅使用消融导管进行左心房标测。起搏操作用于确认出口阻滞。使用 HPSD(n=34)与对照(n=57)消融方案比较程序特征和成功率。无复发定义为 1 年内无 30s 以上的 AF 发作,超过 3 个月的空白期。

结果

使用 HPSD 方案,与 SP 相比,中位手术和 RF 消融时间显著缩短,分别为 84(IQR 76-100)分钟与 118 分钟(IQR 104-141)和 1036(898-1184)秒与 1949 秒(IQR 1693-2261),所有 P<0.001。HPSD 方案首次通过 PVI 的成功率为 88%,SP 为 87%,P=1.0。未观察到程序并发症。与 SP 相比,使用 HPSD 方案的患者的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白水平显著升高。在 12 个月的随访中,87%的患者无 AF 发作,两组之间无差异。

结论

使用极简、HPSD 消融指数指导的单导管方法进行 PVI 非常有效、安全,并且在 1 年时具有出色的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5918/9726791/0ac77ac4fe01/10840_2022_1226_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验