• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床使用 6 个月后整体氧化锆冠导致的牙釉质磨损。

Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):314-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1111/joor.12139
PMID:24447258
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns and to compare this with enamel wear caused by contralateral natural antagonists. Twenty monolithic zirconia crowns were placed in 20 patients requiring full molar crowns. For measurement of wear, impressions of both jaws were made at baseline after crown cementation and at 6-month follow-up. Mean and maximum wear of the occlusal contact areas of the crowns, of their natural antagonists and of the two contralateral natural antagonists were measured by the use of plaster replicas and 3D laser scanning methods. Wear differences were investigated by the use of two-sided paired Student's t-tests and by linear regression analysis. Mean vertical loss (maximum vertical loss in parentheses) was 10 (43) μm for the zirconia crowns, 33 (112) μm for the opposing enamel, 10 (58) μm for the contralateral teeth and 10 (46) μm for the contralateral antagonists. Both mean and maximum enamel wear were significantly different between the antagonists of the zirconia crowns and the contralateral antagonists. Gender and activity of the masseter muscle at night (bruxism) were identified as possible confounders which significantly affected wear. Under clinical conditions, monolithic zirconia crowns seem to be associated with more wear of opposed enamel than are natural teeth. With regard to wear behaviour, clinical application of monolithic zirconia crowns is justifiable because the amount of antagonistic enamel wear after 6 months is comparable with, or even lower than, that caused by other ceramic materials in previous studies.

摘要

本研究旨在评估整体氧化锆冠引起的牙釉质磨损,并将其与对侧天然牙的牙釉质磨损进行比较。将 20 个整体氧化锆冠放置在 20 名需要全磨牙冠的患者中。为了测量磨损,在牙冠粘固后和 6 个月随访时,通过印模分别获取上下颌的印象。通过石膏代型和 3D 激光扫描方法,测量了牙冠、天然牙和对侧天然牙的牙尖窝接触区的磨损均值和最大磨损值。使用双侧配对学生 t 检验和线性回归分析来研究磨损差异。氧化锆冠的平均垂直磨损量(括号内为最大垂直磨损量)为 10(43)μm,对颌牙釉质的磨损量为 33(112)μm,对侧牙的磨损量为 10(58)μm,对侧牙的磨损量为 10(46)μm。牙釉质的平均和最大磨损值在氧化锆冠的对颌牙和对侧牙之间均有显著差异。性别和夜间(磨牙症)咀嚼肌的活动被确定为可能的混杂因素,显著影响了磨损。在临床条件下,整体氧化锆冠似乎会导致与天然牙相比,对颌牙釉质磨损更多。关于磨损行为,整体氧化锆冠的临床应用是合理的,因为 6 个月后对颌牙釉质的磨损量与之前研究中其他陶瓷材料的磨损量相当,甚至更低。

相似文献

1
Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.临床使用 6 个月后整体氧化锆冠导致的牙釉质磨损。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):314-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
2
Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns.全瓷氧化锆冠所致牙釉质磨损的临床评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Aug;43(8):621-9. doi: 10.1111/joor.12409. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns.评估天然牙釉质作为氧化锆和金属陶瓷冠对抗牙的磨损情况的临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 May 16.
4
Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns.随机临床研究牙釉质对磨耗抛光整体氧化锆冠。
J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years.两年后整体式氧化锆全冠的对抗牙磨损情况
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1165-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Wear of Natural Enamel Antagonist Against Glazed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns and Polished Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: An In Vivo Study.天然牙釉质对抗烤瓷熔附金属全冠和抛光氧化锆全冠磨损的比较评价:一项体内研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2023 May-June;36(3):273–281. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7798. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
7
Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.人牙釉质与整体式氧化锆、玻璃陶瓷和复合树脂相对抗时的磨损:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
8
A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.全瓷与金属烤瓷冠牙釉质磨耗的临床对比评估
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 November/December;34(6):744–751. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6598. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Monolithic zirconia crowns in the aesthetic zone in heavy grinders with severe tooth wear - An observational case-series.重度磨耗患者牙列重度磨耗区采用整体氧化锆全冠修复 - 一项观察性病例系列研究。
J Dent. 2018 May;72:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
Assessment of Antagonist Enamel Wear and Clinical Performance of Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: One-Year Results of a Prospective Study.全瓷氧化锆冠的抗釉磨损评估和临床性能:一项前瞻性研究的一年结果。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e411-e416. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12960. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Translucency in Different Thicknesses of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.不同厚度整体式氧化锆全冠的透明度比较分析
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Apr;11(2):e70132. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70132.
2
Impact of deglazing on biaxial flexural strength of high translucent zirconia: effect of hydrothermal aging, pH-cycling, and load-cycling.去釉对高透明度氧化锆双轴弯曲强度的影响:水热老化、pH循环和加载循环的作用
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05810-z.
3
Tribological aspects of enamel wear caused by zirconia and lithium disilicate: A meta-narrative review.
氧化锆和二硅酸锂导致牙釉质磨损的摩擦学研究:一项元叙事综述。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:258-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
4
Prospective clinical study of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia resin-bonded inlay-retained and wing-retained fixed partial dentures over 5 years.5年单块氧化锆树脂粘结嵌体固位和翼板固位固定局部义齿所致牙釉质磨损的前瞻性临床研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 13;29(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06103-5.
5
In vitro effect of zirconia type on shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain and wear of the opposing teeth.氧化锆类型对与长石质瓷的剪切粘结强度及对颌牙磨损的体外影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Spring;18(2):123-128. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40755. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Evaluation of Hardness and Wear of Conventional and Transparent Zirconia Ceramics, Feldspathic Ceramic, Glaze, and Enamel.传统及透明氧化锆陶瓷、长石质陶瓷、釉质和牙釉质的硬度与磨损评估
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;17(14):3518. doi: 10.3390/ma17143518.
7
Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Occlusal Veneers Made from 3Y-TZP Zirconia.由3Y-TZP氧化锆制成的3D打印咬合贴面的抗折性
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;17(9):2122. doi: 10.3390/ma17092122.
8
3D quantitative analysis and SEM qualitative analysis of natural antagonist enamel opposing CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia or lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns versus enamel opposing natural enamel.与天然牙釉质相对的CAD-CAM整体式氧化锆或二硅酸锂牙支持冠的天然拮抗牙釉质的三维定量分析和扫描电子显微镜定性分析,对比天然牙釉质相对的天然牙釉质。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Feb;16(1):12-24. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.1.12. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Vertical Marginal Discrepancy of a Monolithic Zirconia Crown with Different Cement Spaces.不同粘结剂间隙下单块氧化锆全冠的垂直边缘差异
Int J Dent. 2023 Dec 7;2023:6698453. doi: 10.1155/2023/6698453. eCollection 2023.
10
A study on the discoloration of different dental porcelain systems.不同牙科陶瓷系统变色的研究。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 Sep 6;57(3):115-121. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231033050.