文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

1979 年至 2012 年,通过原始和补充上市前批准途径获得心脏植入式电子设备的 FDA 批准。

FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical C.

出版信息

JAMA. 2014;311(4):385-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284986.


DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.284986
PMID:24449317
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4142419/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates high-risk medical devices such as cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, via the premarket approval (PMA) process, during which manufacturers submit clinical data demonstrating safety and effectiveness. Subsequent changes to approved high-risk devices are implemented via "supplements," which may not require additional clinical testing. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prevalence and characteristics of changes to CIEDs made through the PMA supplement process. DESIGN: Using the FDA's PMA database, we reviewed all CIEDs approved as original PMAs or supplements from 1979 through 2012. For each supplement, we collected the date approved, type of supplement (panel-track, 180-day, real-time, special, and 30-day notice), and the nature of the changes. We calculated the number of supplements approved per PMA and analyzed trends relating to different supplement regulatory categories over time. For supplements approved via the 180-day regulatory pathway, which often involve significant design changes, from 2010-2012, we identified how often additional clinical data were collected. RESULTS: From 1979-2012, the FDA approved 77 original and 5829 supplement PMA applications for CIEDs, with a median of 50 supplements per original PMA (interquartile range [IQR], 23-87). Excluding manufacturing changes that do not alter device design, the number of supplements approved each year was stable around a mean (SD) of 2.6 (0.9) supplements per PMA per year. Premarket approvals remained active via successive supplements over a median period of 15 years (IQR, 8-20), and 79% of the 77 original PMAs approved during our study period were the subject of at least 1 supplement in 2012. Thirty-seven percent of approved supplements involved a change to the device's design. Among 180-day supplements approved from 2010-2012, 23% (15/64) included new clinical data to support safety and effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many CIED models currently used by clinicians were approved via the PMA supplement process, not as original PMAs. Most new device models are deemed safe and effective without requiring new clinical data, reinforcing the importance of rigorous postapproval surveillance of these devices.

摘要

重要性:美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 通过上市前批准 (PMA) 程序评估高风险医疗器械,如心脏植入式电子设备 (CIED),包括起搏器、植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备。在此过程中,制造商提交临床数据以证明安全性和有效性。随后对已批准的高风险设备的更改通过“补充”来实施,而补充可能不需要额外的临床测试。

目的:描述通过 PMA 补充程序对 CIED 进行更改的普遍性和特征。

设计:我们使用 FDA 的 PMA 数据库,审查了 1979 年至 2012 年期间作为原始 PMA 或补充批准的所有 CIED。对于每个补充,我们收集了批准日期、补充类型(小组跟踪、180 天、实时、特殊和 30 天通知)和更改的性质。我们计算了每个 PMA 批准的补充数量,并分析了随着时间的推移与不同补充监管类别相关的趋势。对于 2010 年至 2012 年期间通过 180 天监管途径批准的补充,我们经常涉及重大设计变更,我们确定了收集额外临床数据的频率。

结果:1979 年至 2012 年,FDA 批准了 77 项原始和 5829 项补充 PMA 申请用于 CIED,中位数为每个原始 PMA 批准 50 项补充(四分位距 [IQR],23-87)。不包括不改变设备设计的制造变更,每年批准的补充数量保持稳定,平均(SD)每年每个 PMA 批准 2.6(0.9)个补充。在中位数为 15 年(IQR,8-20)的时间内,通过连续的补充保持了 PMA 的持续有效,在我们研究期间批准的 77 个原始 PMA 中有 79%在 2012 年至少有 1 个补充。37%的批准补充涉及设备设计的更改。在 2010 年至 2012 年期间批准的 180 天补充中,23%(15/64)包括支持安全性和有效性的新临床数据。

结论和相关性:目前临床医生使用的许多 CIED 模型是通过 PMA 补充程序而不是原始 PMA 获得批准的。大多数新设备模型被认为是安全有效的,无需新的临床数据,这进一步强调了对这些设备进行严格的上市后监测的重要性。

相似文献

[1]
FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012.

JAMA.

[2]
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016-4

[3]
Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.

Ophthalmology. 2017-5-10

[4]
Postmarket Modifications of High-Risk Therapeutic Devices in Otolaryngology Cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015-9

[5]
Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011.

JAMA. 2015-8-11

[6]
Risk of Recall Associated With Modifications to High-risk Medical Devices Approved Through US Food and Drug Administration Supplements.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-4-3

[7]
Approval of high-risk medical devices in the US: implications for clinical cardiology.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014

[8]
Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Approval of High-Risk Medical Device Supplements.

JAMA. 2017-8-15

[9]
Transparency and Dermatologic Device Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.

JAMA Dermatol. 2018-3-1

[10]
Quantification of US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Statements for High-Risk Medical Devices With Pediatric Age Indications.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-6-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Nonconcurrent Control Use in FDA Approval of High-Risk Medical Devices.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-4-1

[2]
Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review.

BJS Open. 2023-3-7

[3]
Risk of Recall Associated With Modifications to High-risk Medical Devices Approved Through US Food and Drug Administration Supplements.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-4-3

[4]
Fatigue Testing of Wearable Sensing Technologies: Issues and Opportunities.

Materials (Basel). 2021-7-21

[5]
Risk of Recall Among Medical Devices Undergoing US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) Clearance and Premarket Approval, 2008-2017.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-5-3

[6]
Postmarket Modifications of High-risk Plastic Surgery Devices.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020-2-19

[7]
Landscape of Cardiovascular Device Registries in the United States.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019-6-1

[8]
Cybersecurity features of digital medical devices: an analysis of FDA product summaries.

BMJ Open. 2019-6-28

[9]
Premarket evaluation of medical devices: a cross-sectional analysis of clinical studies submitted to a German ethics committee.

BMJ Open. 2019-2-22

[10]
Transparency and Dermatologic Device Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.

JAMA Dermatol. 2018-3-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Unique device identification system. Final rule.

Fed Regist. 2013-9-24

[2]
Variation among hospitals in selection of higher-cost, "higher-tech," implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) Registry.

Am Heart J. 2013-2-14

[3]
The 510(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implant.

N Engl J Med. 2013-1-10

[4]
Inclusion of comparative effectiveness data in high-risk cardiovascular device studies at the time of premarket approval.

JAMA. 2012-11-7

[5]
An ICD lead advisory: a plea for more diligence and more data.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012-6

[6]
Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process.

Arch Intern Med. 2011-6-13

[7]
Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.

JAMA. 2009-12-23

[8]
Premarket clinical evaluation of novel cardiovascular devices: quality analysis of premarket clinical studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration 2000-2007.

Am J Ther. 2010

[9]
Testing new ICD technology.

N Engl J Med. 2008-12-11

[10]
Learning from our mistakes? Testing new ICD technology.

N Engl J Med. 2008-12-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索