Gast Anne
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, <location>Belgium</location>
Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):71-4. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000206.
In the musical Stroop task, which has recently been introduced by Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronat (2013), participants respond to note names that are placed inside musical notes. Musicians respond more slowly to note names that are incongruent with the note than to note names that are congruent with the note. Grégoire et al. propose to use this task to study the acquisition of automaticity by relating musical Stroop effects to the amount of musical experience. I discuss some caveats that have to be considered for these types of analyses. Specifically, I focus on how different contingencies in the learning situation relate to the Stroop effect and on the question whether a long-term perspective is suitable for studying the acquisition of automaticity.
在格雷瓜尔、佩吕谢和普兰-沙罗纳（2013年）最近引入的音乐斯特鲁普任务中，参与者要对置于音符内部的音符名称做出反应。音乐家对与音符不一致的音符名称的反应比对与音符一致的音符名称的反应更慢。格雷瓜尔等人提议利用这个任务，通过将音乐斯特鲁普效应与音乐经验量联系起来，来研究自动化的习得。我讨论了这类分析中必须考虑的一些注意事项。具体而言，我关注学习情境中的不同意外情况如何与斯特鲁普效应相关，以及长期视角是否适合用于研究自动化的习得这一问题。
