Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany,
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Jun;103(6):441-50. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0669-3. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
To investigate whether cardiac magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging (PC-CMR) can determine left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in comparison to echocardiography (EC).
Non-invasive evaluation of diastolic function is important for the diagnostic classification and risk stratification of patients with cardiomyopathies. With EC, diastolic function is classified based on the mitral blood flow, LV myocardial tissue Doppler velocities and pulmonary venous flow. PC-CMR has the potential to measure these parameters and may be an important tool to assess diastolic function in clinical routine.
In 36 patients with various cardiovascular diseases and 6 healthy volunteers, we performed single-slice short-axis PC-CMR at the level of the mitral leaflet tip and the inflow of the pulmonary veins to generate EC-comparable mitral E and A waves, septal and lateral e' and a' tissue velocities, and E/A and E/e' ratios. EC was performed after PC-CMR in all patients and six volunteers. Patients were classified into three groups of DD for both techniques. In addition, we evaluated 120 healthy volunteers as controls (3 age groups: 1 = 20-35 years; 2 = 36-50 years; 3 ≥ 51 years) for reference values.
PC-CMR correlation with EC regarding the relation of mitral E and A velocities was good (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The correlation for the mean septal and lateral E/e' ratio was high with r = 0.90 (p < 0.001). 40/42 subjects (95 %) were categorized correctly. The mean scan time for PC-CMR was 189 ± 16 s and mean analysis time was 348 ± 95 s. EC image acquisition time was slightly higher (201 ± 37 s, p = n.s.), whereas EC image analysis time was significantly lower (149 ± 23 s, p < 0.001).
The classification of DD with PC-CMR is feasible and shows good agreement with the widely accepted EC classification of DD. We present a practical approach for the clinically important assessment of DD with PC-CMR, circumventing sophisticated and time-consuming CMR sequences and specially designed software analysis tools.
探究心脏磁共振相位对比成像(PC-CMR)是否可与超声心动图(EC)相比,用于评估左心室(LV)舒张功能。
舒张功能的无创评估对于心肌病患者的诊断分类和风险分层很重要。EC 基于二尖瓣血流、LV 心肌组织多普勒速度和肺静脉血流来进行舒张功能分类。PC-CMR 具有测量这些参数的潜力,可能是评估临床常规舒张功能的重要工具。
我们对 36 名患有各种心血管疾病的患者和 6 名健康志愿者进行了单切面短轴 PC-CMR 检查,在二尖瓣叶尖端和肺静脉流入处生成与 EC 可比的二尖瓣 E 和 A 波、间隔和侧壁 e'和 a'组织速度以及 E/A 和 E/e'比值。所有患者和 6 名志愿者均在进行 PC-CMR 后进行 EC。将患者分为两组,两组患者在两种技术上均表现为 DD。此外,我们评估了 120 名健康志愿者作为对照(3 个年龄组:1 = 20-35 岁;2 = 36-50 岁;3 ≥ 51 岁)以获取参考值。
PC-CMR 与 EC 关于二尖瓣 E 和 A 速度的关系具有良好的相关性(r = 0.83,p < 0.001)。平均间隔和侧壁 E/e'比值的相关性很高,r = 0.90(p < 0.001)。40/42 名受试者(95%)被正确分类。PC-CMR 的平均扫描时间为 189 ± 16 s,平均分析时间为 348 ± 95 s。EC 图像采集时间略高(201 ± 37 s,p = n.s.),但 EC 图像分析时间明显更低(149 ± 23 s,p < 0.001)。
PC-CMR 对 DD 的分类是可行的,与广泛接受的 EC 对 DD 的分类具有良好的一致性。我们提出了一种实用的方法,用于使用 PC-CMR 进行临床上重要的 DD 评估,规避了复杂且耗时的 CMR 序列和专门设计的软件分析工具。