Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Breast Cancer. 2013 Dec;16(4):417-25. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.4.417. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
Medullary breast carcinomas (MBC) have been known to represent a rare breast cancer subtype associated with a more favorable prognosis than invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC). The purpose of this study was to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of MBC with those of IDC.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with invasive breast cancer who were managed surgically from August 1995 to June 2010.
Fifty-two patients were identified with MBC and 5,716 patients were identified with IDC. The clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients with MBC were compared with those of patients with IDC. The MBC group presented at a younger age (p=0.005) and had a significant association with a higher histological grade (p=0.003) and nuclear grade (p<0.001) as well as negative estrogen receptor (p<0.001) and progesterone receptor (p<0.001) status. Lymphatic invasion was absent (p<0.001) and lymph node metastasis was rare (p<0.001). The DFS and OS did not differ significantly between the two groups (5-year DFS: 88.0% vs. 89.2%, p=0.920; 5-year OS: 93.4% vs. 94.4%, p=0.503). In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with DFS and OS were nuclear grade, histological grade, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However, DFS and OS were not significantly different between IDC and MBC according to histological type itself (DFS: hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.12-6.05, p=0.866; OS: hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.21-10.77, p=0.692).
Although MBC has specific clinicopathologic features, its prognosis does not differ from IDC and is determined by prognostic factors such as tumor size and lymph node metastasis. Therefore, patients with MBC also require the same intensive treatment provided for IDC.
髓样乳腺癌(MBC)是一种罕见的乳腺癌亚型,其预后优于浸润性导管癌(IDC)。本研究旨在比较 MBC 和 IDC 的临床病理特征和结局。
我们回顾性分析了 1995 年 8 月至 2010 年 6 月接受手术治疗的浸润性乳腺癌患者的病历。
共发现 52 例 MBC 患者和 5716 例 IDC 患者。比较 MBC 组和 IDC 组患者的临床病理特征、无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。MBC 组发病年龄较轻(p=0.005),组织学分级(p=0.003)和核分级(p<0.001)较高,雌激素受体(p<0.001)和孕激素受体(p<0.001)阴性率较高。无淋巴血管侵犯(p<0.001),淋巴结转移罕见(p<0.001)。两组间 DFS 和 OS 无显著差异(5 年 DFS:88.0% vs. 89.2%,p=0.920;5 年 OS:93.4% vs. 94.4%,p=0.503)。多因素分析显示,DFS 和 OS 的相关因素为核分级、组织学分级、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移、雌激素受体状态、孕激素受体状态、人表皮生长因子受体 2 状态、化疗和激素治疗。然而,根据组织学类型本身,IDC 和 MBC 之间的 DFS 和 OS 无显著差异(DFS:风险比 0.85,95%置信区间 0.12-6.05,p=0.866;OS:风险比 1.49,95%置信区间 0.21-10.77,p=0.692)。
虽然 MBC 具有特定的临床病理特征,但预后与 IDC 无差异,由肿瘤大小和淋巴结转移等预后因素决定。因此,MBC 患者也需要接受与 IDC 相同的强化治疗。