在腹腔镜前列腺根治性切除术后,简单重建肛提肌后区并保留耻骨前列腺韧带可减少早期控尿的恢复时间。
A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
机构信息
Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Karlstad , Värmland, Sweden .
出版信息
J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):481-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0633. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
BACKGROUND
Incontinence is a drawback after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Several surgical methods to improve continence have been described however with contradictory results.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether a modified surgical technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) improves postoperative continence.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This is a prospective nonrandomized study with two consecutive series of 100 patients in each group. The first group from 2005 to 2008 underwent a standard LRP. The second group from 2009 to 2011 was subjected to a modified LRP by sparing of puboprostatic ligaments, including the preservation of arcus tendineous, and using a simple posterior tension-releasing suture adapting the urethra stump to the bladder before the anastomosis. The patients had the same preoperative work-up and comparable preoperative baseline characteristics. The 2-year follow-up of the patients included a continence questionnaire and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Urinary peak flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR) volume were assessed at 3 months. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad/day.
RESULTS
Only 99 patients were evaluated in each group. The patients had comparable operative characteristics. The continence rates after the modified technique vs the standard were 33% vs 16%, p=0.007 at 1 month; 66% vs 44%, p=0.002 at 3 months; 81% vs 67%, p=0.034 at 6 months; 92% vs 80%, p=0.024 at 12 months; and 95% vs 86%, p=0.05 at 2 years. No significant differences were found regarding voiding functions, the Qmax, the PVR volume, or the IPSS. Three patients developed urethral stricture in the standard group compared with none in the modified group. The negative margin rates were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS
The anterior preservation and posterior suture technique studied is a simple, safe, and efficient method to shorten the time to continence after LRP without adverse effects on voiding or compromising the margin rates.
背景
前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁是一个难题。有几种手术方法可以改善尿失禁,但结果却相互矛盾。
目的
确定腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(LRP)中改良手术技术是否能改善术后尿失禁。
患者和方法
这是一项前瞻性非随机研究,每组连续纳入 100 例患者。第一组(2005 年至 2008 年)接受标准 LRP,第二组(2009 年至 2011 年)接受改良 LRP,即保留耻骨前列腺韧带,包括保留弧形肌腱,并在吻合前使用简单的后向张力释放缝线将尿道残端调整至膀胱。两组患者术前检查相同,术前基线特征具有可比性。对患者进行为期 2 年的随访,包括尿失禁问卷和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。在术后 3 个月评估尿流率(Qmax)和残余尿量(PVR)。定义 1 天使用 1 片及以下尿垫为尿控。
结果
每组仅对 99 例患者进行了评估。两组患者的手术特点相似。改良技术组与标准组的尿控率在 1 个月时分别为 33%和 16%,p=0.007;3 个月时分别为 66%和 44%,p=0.002;6 个月时分别为 81%和 67%,p=0.034;12 个月时分别为 92%和 80%,p=0.024;24 个月时分别为 95%和 86%,p=0.05。两组在排尿功能、Qmax、PVR 体积或 IPSS 方面无显著差异。标准组有 3 例发生尿道狭窄,改良组无尿道狭窄。两组的切缘阴性率无变化。
结论
研究中采用的保留前侧、后侧缝线技术是一种简单、安全、有效的缩短 LRP 后尿控时间的方法,对排尿功能无不良影响,也不会降低切缘阴性率。