College of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, PR China; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK.
Ultrasonics. 2014 Sep;54(7):1842-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
In this paper the total focusing method, the so called gold standard in classical beamforming, is compared with the widely used time-reversal MUSIC super resolution technique in terms of its ability to resolve closely spaced scatterers in a solid. The algorithms are tested with simulated and experimental array data, each containing different noise levels. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated in terms of lateral resolution and sensitivity to noise. It is shown that for the weak noise situation (SNR>20 dB), time-reversal MUSIC provides significantly enhanced lateral resolution when compared to the total focusing method, breaking the diffraction limit. However, for higher noise levels, the total focusing method is shown to be robust, whilst the performance of time-reversal MUSIC is degraded. The influence of multiple scattering on the imaging algorithms is also investigated and shown to be small.
本文比较了全聚焦方法(经典波束形成的所谓“金标准”)和广泛使用的时间反转 MUSIC 超分辨率技术,以评估它们在固体中分辨近距离散射体的能力。算法使用模拟和实验的阵列数据进行了测试,每个数据都包含不同的噪声水平。算法的性能根据横向分辨率和对噪声的敏感性进行评估。结果表明,在弱噪声情况下(SNR>20dB),与全聚焦方法相比,时间反转 MUSIC 显著提高了横向分辨率,突破了衍射极限。然而,在更高的噪声水平下,全聚焦方法表现出稳健性,而时间反转 MUSIC 的性能则下降。还研究了多次散射对成像算法的影响,结果表明影响较小。