Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Lung Cancer. 2014 Mar;83(3):396-400. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
Survival after diagnosis of lung cancer is poor and seemingly lower in the UK than other Western countries, due in large part to late presentation with advanced disease precluding curative treatment. Recent research suggests that around one-third of lung cancer patients reach specialist care after emergency presentation and have a worse survival outcome. Confirmation of these data and understanding which patients are affected may allow a targeted approach to improving outcomes.
We used data from the UK National Lung Cancer Audit in a multivariate logistic regression model to quantify the association of non-elective referral in non-small cell lung cancer patients with covariates including age, sex, stage, performance status, co-morbidity and socioeconomic status and used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model to quantify survival by source of referral.
In an analysis of 133,530 cases of NSCLC who presented 2006-2011, 19% of patients were referred non-electively (following an emergency admission to hospital or following an emergency presentation to A&E). This route of referral was strongly associated with more advanced disease stage (e.g. in Stage IV - OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 2.14-2.57, p<0.001) and worse performance status (e.g. in PS 4 - OR: 7.28, 95% CI: 6.75-7.86, p<0.001), but was also independently associated with worse socioeconomic status, and extremes of age. These patients were more likely to have died within 1 year of diagnosis (hazard ratio of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.49-1.54) after adjustment for key clinical variables.
Our data confirm and quantify poorer survival in lung cancer patients who are referred non-electively to specialist care, which is more common in patients with poorer performance status, higher disease stage and less advantaged socioeconomic status. Work to tackle this late presentation should be urgently accelerated, since its realisation holds the promise of improved outcomes and better healthcare resource utilisation.
肺癌患者的生存率较差,而且在英国似乎比其他西方国家更低,这主要是由于晚期疾病的出现,排除了治愈性治疗的可能。最近的研究表明,大约三分之一的肺癌患者在紧急就诊后接受了专科治疗,并且生存结果更差。确认这些数据并了解受影响的患者可以采取有针对性的方法来改善结果。
我们使用英国国家肺癌审计的数据,通过多变量逻辑回归模型来量化非小细胞肺癌患者非选择性转诊与包括年龄、性别、分期、表现状态、合并症和社会经济状况等因素的相关性,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险模型来量化按转诊来源的生存情况。
在对 2006-2011 年期间就诊的 133530 例非小细胞肺癌患者的分析中,19%的患者是通过非选择性转诊(在紧急住院或紧急就诊于急症室后)。这种转诊途径与更晚期的疾病阶段密切相关(例如在 IV 期 - OR:2.34,95%CI:2.14-2.57,p<0.001)和更差的表现状态(例如在 PS4-OR:7.28,95%CI:6.75-7.86,p<0.001),但也与较差的社会经济地位和年龄极端情况独立相关。这些患者在诊断后 1 年内死亡的可能性更高(在调整了关键临床变量后,危险比为 1.51(95%CI:1.49-1.54)。
我们的数据证实并量化了在专科治疗中被非选择性转诊的肺癌患者的生存率较差,这在表现状态较差、疾病分期较高和社会经济地位较低的患者中更为常见。为解决这种晚期就诊的问题应紧急加速工作,因为这有望改善结果并更好地利用医疗资源。