Grewal Keerat, Thompson Cameron, Ovens Howard, Sutradhar Rinku, Savage David W, Borgundvaag Bjug, Cheskes Sheldon, de Wit Kerstin, Eskander Antoine, Irish Jonathan, Bender Jacqueline L, Krzyzanowska Monika, Mohindra Rohit, Thiruganasambandamoorthy Venkatesh, McLeod Shelley L
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, 2B 213-600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
CJEM. 2024 Dec;26(12):865-874. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00787-0. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
Little is known about how patients are managed after a suspected cancer diagnosis through the emergency department. The objective of this study was to examine the ED management, specifically referral practices, for ten suspected cancer diagnoses by emergency physicians across Ontario and to explore variability in management by cancer-type and centre.
An electronic survey was distributed to emergency physicians across Ontario, asking about referral practices for patients who could be discharged from the ED with one of ten suspected cancer diagnoses. Options for referral included: in-ED consult, outpatient medical or surgical specialists, surgical or medical oncology, and specialized cancer clinics. Data were described using frequencies and proportions. Variance partition coefficients were calculated to determine variation in responses attributed to differences between hospitals, with physicians nested within hospitals.
262 physicians from 54 EDs responded. Across most cancers, emergency physicians would refer to surgical specialists for further work-up; however, this ranged from 30.2% for lung cancer to 69.5% for head and neck cancer. For patients with an unknown primary malignancy, most physicians would refer to internal medicine clinic (34.3%) or obtain an in-ED consult (25.0%). Few physicians would refer directly to surgical or medical oncology from the ED. Comments suggest this may be due to oncologists requiring tissue confirmation of malignancy. Most referrals to specialized clinics were for suspected lung (30.2%) or breast cancer (19.5%); however, these appear to only be available at some centres. Variance in referrals between hospitals was lowest for breast cancer (variance partition coefficient = 8.6%) and highest for unknown primary malignancies (variance partition coefficient = 29.8%).
Physician management of new suspected cancer varies between EDs and is specific to cancer type. Strategies to standardize access to cancer care in a timely and equitable way for patients with newly suspected cancer in the ED are needed.
对于通过急诊科进行疑似癌症诊断后的患者管理情况,我们了解甚少。本研究的目的是调查安大略省急诊医生对十种疑似癌症诊断的急诊管理情况,特别是转诊做法,并探讨不同癌症类型和中心在管理上的差异。
向安大略省的急诊医生发放了一份电子调查问卷,询问对于可以从急诊科出院的患有十种疑似癌症诊断之一的患者的转诊做法。转诊选项包括:急诊科内会诊、门诊内科或外科专家、外科或内科肿瘤学以及专门的癌症诊所。使用频率和比例对数据进行描述。计算方差划分系数以确定因医院间差异导致的回答差异,医生嵌套在医院内。
来自54个急诊科的262名医生做出了回应。在大多数癌症中,急诊医生会将患者转诊给外科专家进行进一步检查;然而,这一比例从肺癌的30.2%到头颈癌的69.5%不等。对于原发恶性肿瘤不明的患者,大多数医生会转诊至内科诊所(34.3%)或在急诊科内进行会诊(25.0%)。很少有医生会直接从急诊科转诊至外科或内科肿瘤学。评论表明这可能是由于肿瘤学家需要恶性肿瘤的组织确认。大多数转诊至专门诊所的是疑似肺癌(30.2%)或乳腺癌(19.5%)的患者;然而,这些诊所似乎仅在一些中心才有。医院间转诊差异在乳腺癌中最低(方差划分系数 = 8.6%),在原发恶性肿瘤不明的情况下最高(方差划分系数 = 29.8%)。
急诊医生对新的疑似癌症的管理在不同急诊科之间存在差异,且因癌症类型而异。需要制定策略,以便为急诊科新的疑似癌症患者及时、公平地提供标准化的癌症护理途径。