Worthy Graham A J, Worthy Tamara A M
Physiological Ecology and Bioenergetics Lab, Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816; 2Hubbs-SeaWorld Research Institute, Orlando, Florida 32820.
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2014 Jan-Feb;87(1):77-91. doi: 10.1086/673545. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
Digestive efficiencies (Dm) of ex situ and in situ manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) were, for the first time, assessed using manganese (Mn(2+)) as a naturally occurring marker. The Dm of ex situ manatees determined using [Mn(2+)] did not differ significantly from the Dm assessed using lignin, supporting the efficacy of the manganese approach. Gastrointestinal tract samples, obtained from recently dead animals, showed [Mn(2+)] concentrations were lowest in the stomach and remained low in the duodenum and small intestine but increased in the cecum, colon, and rectum, consistent with colonic digestion and absorption. In situ manatees consuming marine vegetation had significantly lower Dm (mean ± SE, 46.9% ± 1.8%; n=8) than did in situ manatees consuming freshwater vegetation (77.8% ± 2.6%; n=7), which in turn had significantly lower values than did ex situ manatees consuming lettuce (84.0% ± 0.7%; n=37). In situ manatees eating seagrasses had significantly higher Dm than did long-term ex situ animals consuming seagrass for short periods of time (46.9% ± 1.8% vs. 36.2% ± 1.2%, respectively), suggesting potential modification of gut flora over time. One significant ramification of our results is that manatees consuming seagrasses would require a greater standing biomass to support their needs than would be required if they were eating freshwater vegetation. This reinforces the critical need to implement habitat conservation and protection before considering downlisting or delisting manatees as an endangered species.
首次使用锰(Mn(2+))作为天然标志物,评估了异地和原地海牛(西印度海牛指名亚种)的消化效率(Dm)。使用[Mn(2+)]测定的异地海牛的Dm与使用木质素评估的Dm没有显著差异,这支持了锰方法的有效性。从近期死亡动物获取的胃肠道样本显示,[Mn(2+)]浓度在胃中最低,在十二指肠和小肠中保持较低水平,但在盲肠、结肠和直肠中升高,这与结肠的消化和吸收一致。食用海洋植物的原地海牛的Dm(平均值±标准误,46.9%±1.8%;n = 8)显著低于食用淡水植物的原地海牛(77.8%±2.6%;n = 7),而后者的值又显著低于食用生菜的异地海牛(84.0%±0.7%;n = 37)。食用海草的原地海牛的Dm显著高于短期食用海草的长期异地动物(分别为46.9%±1.8%和36.2%±1.2%),这表明随着时间推移肠道菌群可能发生改变。我们研究结果的一个重要影响是,与食用淡水植物相比,食用海草的海牛需要更多的现存生物量来满足其需求。这强化了在考虑将海牛从濒危物种名单中降级或除名之前实施栖息地保护的迫切需求。