Hillman Stanley S, Drewes Robert C, Hedrick Michael S, Hancock Thomas V
Department of Biology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97207; 2Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118; 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203; 4Department of Biology, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington 99004.
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2014 Jan-Feb;87(1):105-12. doi: 10.1086/671109. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Physiological vagility represents the capacity to move sustainably and is central to fully explaining the processes involved in creating fine-scale genetic structure of amphibian populations, because movement (vagility) and the duration of movement determine the dispersal distance individuals can move to interbreed. The tendency for amphibians to maintain genetic differentiation over relatively short distances (isolation by distance) has been attributed to their limited dispersal capacity (low vagility) compared with other vertebrates. Earlier studies analyzing genetic isolation and population differentiation with distance treat all amphibians as equally vagile and attempt to explain genetic differentiation only in terms of physical environmental characteristics. We introduce a new quantitative metric for vagility that incorporates aerobic capacity, body size, body temperature, and the cost of transport and is independent of the physical characteristics of the environment. We test our metric for vagility with data for dispersal distance and body mass in amphibians and correlate vagility with data for genetic differentiation (F'(ST)). Both dispersal distance and vagility increase with body size. Differentiation (F'(ST)) of neutral microsatellite markers with distance was inversely and significantly (R2=0.61) related to ln vagility. Genetic differentiation with distance was not significantly related to body mass alone. Generalized observations are validated with several specific amphibian studies. These results suggest that interspecific differences in physiological capacity for movement (vagility) can contribute to genetic differentiation and metapopulation structure in amphibians.
生理活动能力代表了可持续移动的能力,对于充分解释两栖动物种群精细尺度遗传结构形成过程至关重要,因为移动(活动能力)和移动持续时间决定了个体能够移动进行杂交的扩散距离。两栖动物在相对较短距离内保持遗传分化的趋势(距离隔离)被认为是由于与其他脊椎动物相比,它们的扩散能力有限(活动能力低)。早期分析遗传隔离和种群分化与距离关系的研究将所有两栖动物视为具有同等活动能力,并仅试图根据物理环境特征来解释遗传分化。我们引入了一种新的活动能力定量指标,该指标纳入了有氧能力、体型、体温和运输成本,且与环境的物理特征无关。我们用两栖动物的扩散距离和体重数据来测试我们的活动能力指标,并将活动能力与遗传分化数据(F'(ST))相关联。扩散距离和活动能力均随体型增大而增加。中性微卫星标记的分化(F'(ST))与距离呈负相关且显著相关(R2 = 0.61),与ln活动能力相关。遗传分化与距离单独与体重无显著关系。通过几项特定的两栖动物研究验证了一般性观察结果。这些结果表明,生理移动能力(活动能力)的种间差异可导致两栖动物的遗传分化和集合种群结构。