Suppr超能文献

2012 年东亚国家炎症性肠病诊断和治疗的问卷调查。

A questionnaire-based survey on the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease in East Asian countries in 2012.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, CHA University School of Medicine and CHA University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, South Korea.

出版信息

Digestion. 2014;89(1):88-103. doi: 10.1159/000356706. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The prevalence and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are lower in East Asia than in Western countries; however, marked increases have recently been reported. The clinical diagnosis and medical management of IBD in East Asia differ from those in Western countries. A questionnaire-based survey was performed to gather physicians' current opinions on IBD in different East Asian countries.

METHODS

Representative International Gastrointestinal Consensus Symposium (IGICS) committee members provided a questionnaire to physicians in each East Asian country studied. The questionnaire mainly focused on the diagnosis and management of IBD.

RESULTS

There were 19 respondents from Japan, 10 from South Korea, 9 from the Philippines, 6 from China and 4 from Indonesia. Colonoscopy (100%) and histopathology (63%) were commonly used for the diagnosis in ulcerative colitis (UC). Conventional small bowel enteroclysis was still the most common diagnostic tool for assessing small bowel lesions in Crohn's disease (CD) in East Asia. The percentage of physicians who investigated the reactivation of Cytomegalovirus in severe or refractory patients with UC ranged from 0% in the Philippines and Indonesia to 100% in Japan and Korea. Most physicians in Korea, the Philippines, China and Indonesia chose thiopurines or anti-TNF therapy as the second-line treatment in severe refractory UC, whereas Japanese physicians preferred to use tacrolimus or leukocyte apheresis. Physicians in the Philippines and Indonesia preferred to use oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for newly diagnosed severe ileocecal CD. In contrast, Korean physicians chose oral steroids and most physicians in China and Japan preferred to use anti-TNF. Nutritional therapy to induce or maintain remission in patients with CD was commonly used in Indonesia, Japan and China. Targeted biopsies by conventional colonoscopy were the most preferred strategy for cancer surveillance in long-standing UC over random biopsies in this region.

CONCLUSIONS

The present survey found that current diagnostic approaches and clinical management of IBD vary within East Asian countries.

摘要

背景与目的

炎症性肠病(IBD)在东亚的流行率和发病率低于西方国家,但最近报告发病率显著增加。东亚国家在 IBD 的临床诊断和医疗管理方面与西方国家不同。本研究通过问卷调查的方式,收集了不同东亚国家医生对 IBD 的现状看法。

方法

研究代表国际胃肠共识研讨会(IGICS)委员会成员向每个研究东亚国家的医生提供了一份问卷。问卷主要集中在 IBD 的诊断和管理上。

结果

日本有 19 名受访者,韩国有 10 名,菲律宾有 9 名,中国有 6 名,印度尼西亚有 4 名。溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的诊断中,结肠镜检查(100%)和组织病理学(63%)是常用方法。在东亚,传统的小肠小肠造影术仍然是评估克罗恩病(CD)小肠病变的最常用诊断工具。对重症或难治性 UC 患者巨细胞病毒再激活进行调查的医生比例从菲律宾和印度尼西亚的 0%到日本和韩国的 100%不等。在韩国、菲律宾、中国和印度尼西亚,大多数医生选择硫唑嘌呤或抗 TNF 治疗作为重症难治性 UC 的二线治疗,而日本医生更倾向于使用他克莫司或白细胞吸附。菲律宾和印度尼西亚的医生更喜欢使用口服 5-氨基水杨酸治疗新诊断的严重回盲部 CD。相比之下,韩国医生选择口服类固醇,中国和日本的大多数医生则更喜欢使用抗 TNF。营养治疗在东亚用于诱导或维持 CD 缓解,在印度尼西亚、日本和中国较为常用。在该地区,常规结肠镜检查的靶向活检是长期 UC 患者癌症监测的最优先策略,而不是随机活检。

结论

本研究发现东亚国家目前 IBD 的诊断方法和临床管理方法存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验