Hagenauw Loes A, Karsten Julie, Akkerman-Bouwsema Gerjonne J, de Jager Bert E, Lancel Marike
GGZ Drenthe, Assen, The Netherlands
GGZ Drenthe, Assen, The Netherlands.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Jun;59(7):685-700. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13519744. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
Arsonists are often treated in forensic settings. However, high recidivism rates indicate that treatment is not yet optimal for these offenders. The aim of this case series study is to identify arsonist specific dynamic risk factors that can be targeted during treatment. For this study, we used patient files of and interviews with all patients that were currently housed at a forensic psychiatric hospital in the Netherlands (14 arsonists, 59 non-arsonists). To delineate differences in risk factors between arsonists and non-arsonists, scores on the risk assessment instrument the Historical Clinical Future-30 (HKT-30; completed for 11 arsonists and 35 non-arsonists), an instrument similar to the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), were compared. The groups did not differ on demographic factors and psychopathology. Concerning dynamic risk factors, arsonists had significantly poorer social and relational skills and were more hostile. Although this study needs replication, these findings suggest that the treatment of people involved in firesetting should particularly target these risk factors.
纵火犯通常在法医环境中接受治疗。然而,高累犯率表明,对这些罪犯的治疗尚未达到最佳效果。本病例系列研究的目的是确定在治疗期间可以针对的纵火犯特定动态风险因素。在本研究中,我们使用了荷兰一家法医精神病医院目前收治的所有患者(14名纵火犯、59名非纵火犯)的病历档案并对他们进行了访谈。为了描述纵火犯和非纵火犯之间风险因素的差异,我们比较了风险评估工具“历史临床未来-30”(HKT-30;11名纵火犯和35名非纵火犯完成了该评估)的得分,该工具类似于“历史临床风险管理-20”(HCR-20)。两组在人口统计学因素和精神病理学方面没有差异。关于动态风险因素,纵火犯的社交和关系技能明显较差,且更具敌意。尽管本研究需要重复验证,但这些发现表明,对涉及纵火的人员进行治疗时应特别针对这些风险因素。