Suppr超能文献

DDD起搏器心室触发期的行为表现。

Behavior of the ventricular triggering period of DDD pacemakers.

作者信息

Barold S S, Belott P H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Genesee Hospital, Rochester, New York 14607.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Nov;10(6):1237-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04960.x.

Abstract

Fifty-seven patients with implanted DDD pulse generators (23 Intermedics Cosmos and 34 Medtronic Symbios) were studied to characterize the behavior of the so-called ventricular safety pace period or nonphysiologic AV delay (ventricular triggering period) in a variety of circumstances. The pulse generators were programmed to various combinations of upper rate, lower rate, and atrioventricular (AV) intervals. We then evaluated the response of the pulse generators to a variety of signals sensed by the ventricular channel during the ventricular triggering period (VTP). In the Cosmos DDD pulse generators, the VTP lengthened from its nominal value (100 ms) whenever the sum of the atrial escape (pacemaker VA) interval and the nominal value of the VTP was shorter than the upper rate limit interval. Extension of the VTP reflected the necessary delay required to maintain constancy of the (ventricular) upper rate limit interval. In contrast, the Medtronic Symbios DDD pulse generators exhibited constancy of the VTP even when the sum of the atrial escape (pacemaker VA) interval and the duration of the nonprogrammable VTP (110 ms) was shorter than the upper rate limit interval. This response was observed only with a programmed lower rate of 90 ppm, upper rate of 100 ppm, and AV interval of 250 ms. Under these circumstances, in the presence of crosstalk or myopotentials sensed in the VTP, the Symbios DDD pulse generator violated its ventricular upper rate limit interval, but remained faithful to its separate (but equal) atrial upper rate limit interval by omitting the succeeding atrial stimulus. The behavior of the VTP of DDD pulse generators, particularly its relation to the upper rate response, must be known for the proper interpretation of pacemaker function.

摘要

对57例植入DDD脉冲发生器的患者(23例使用Intermedics Cosmos,34例使用美敦力Symbios)进行了研究,以描述在各种情况下所谓的心室安全起搏间期或非生理性房室延迟(心室触发间期)的行为。将脉冲发生器编程为不同的上限频率、下限频率和房室(AV)间期组合。然后,我们评估了脉冲发生器在心室触发期(VTP)对心室通道感知到的各种信号的反应。在Cosmos DDD脉冲发生器中,只要心房逸搏(起搏器VA)间期与VTP的标称值之和短于上限频率间期,VTP就会从其标称值(100毫秒)延长。VTP的延长反映了维持(心室)上限频率间期恒定所需的必要延迟。相比之下,美敦力Symbios DDD脉冲发生器即使在心房逸搏(起搏器VA)间期与不可编程VTP的持续时间(110毫秒)之和短于上限频率间期时,VTP仍保持恒定。仅在编程的下限频率为90次/分钟、上限频率为100次/分钟且AV间期为250毫秒的情况下观察到这种反应。在这些情况下,在VTP期间存在串扰或肌电位时,Symbios DDD脉冲发生器会违反其心室上限频率间期,但通过省略后续的心房刺激,仍忠实于其单独(但相等)的心房上限频率间期。为了正确解释起搏器功能,必须了解DDD脉冲发生器VTP的行为,特别是其与上限频率反应的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验