• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植患者满意度与治疗结果之间的关联

Association between patient satisfaction and outcomes in kidney transplant.

作者信息

Srinivas Rajagopal, Chavin Kenneth D, Baliga Prabhakar K, Srinivas Titte, Taber David J

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):180-5. doi: 10.1177/1062860613519163. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1177/1062860613519163
PMID:24463328
Abstract

This was a cross-sectional cohort study analyzing aggregate publicly reported data integrated from 2 primary sources and included all US accredited kidney transplant programs that report data within the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Hospital Compare; 188 kidney transplant programs, representing 15 710 transplants were included in this study. In general, the scores for patient satisfaction questions were higher for higher-performing transplant programs; 5 questions reached statistically significant associations (P < .05). A composite of these 5 questions demonstrated a strong association with a center's performance indices for both 1-month and 1-year graft and patient outcomes (69% vs 40%, P < .001, and 60% vs 44%, P = .035, respectively), which remained significant after controlling for baseline demographics. The results demonstrate that there is a positive and statistically significant correlation between a patient's perceived quality of care, as measured by HCAHPS data, and quantified clinical outcomes for graft loss and patient death in kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

这是一项横断面队列研究,分析了从两个主要来源整合的公开报告数据,纳入了所有在美国器官移植受者科学登记处和医院比较系统中报告数据的美国认证肾脏移植项目;本研究纳入了188个肾脏移植项目,代表15710例移植。总体而言,表现较好的移植项目在患者满意度问题上的得分更高;5个问题达到了统计学显著关联(P < 0.05)。这5个问题的综合结果显示,与中心1个月和1年的移植物及患者结局的表现指标有很强的关联(分别为69%对40%,P < 0.001,以及60%对44%,P = 0.035),在控制基线人口统计学因素后仍具有显著性。结果表明,通过医院患者医疗服务评估(HCAHPS)数据衡量的患者感知护理质量与肾脏移植受者移植物丢失和患者死亡的量化临床结局之间存在正相关且具有统计学显著性。

相似文献

1
Association between patient satisfaction and outcomes in kidney transplant.肾移植患者满意度与治疗结果之间的关联
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):180-5. doi: 10.1177/1062860613519163. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
A multi-factor analysis of kidney regraft outcomes.肾脏再次移植结果的多因素分析。
Clin Transpl. 2002:335-49.
3
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October 2002.截至2002年10月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transpl. 2002:41-77.
4
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1999:1-21.
5
Intestine and multivisceral transplantation in the United States: a report of 20-year national registry data (1990-2009).美国的肠道和多脏器移植:20年国家登记数据报告(1990 - 2009年)
Clin Transpl. 2009:83-101.
6
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and non-US cases reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October, 2000.截至2000年10月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告的美国胰腺移植病例以及向国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的非美国胰腺移植病例的结果。
Clin Transpl. 2000:45-72.
7
Do Patient Assessments of Hospital Quality Correlate With Kidney Transplantation Surgical Outcomes?患者对医院质量的评估与肾移植手术结果相关吗?
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jul-Aug;48(6):1986-92. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.038.
8
Pancreas transplantation in the United States as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and analyzed by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)报告并经国际胰腺移植登记处分析的美国胰腺移植情况。
Clin Transpl. 1995:49-67.
9
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国胰腺移植病例的结果。
Clin Transpl. 2008:45-56.
10
Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004.截至2004年6月,向器官共享联合网络(UNOS)和国际胰腺移植登记处(IPTR)报告的美国及非美国病例的胰腺移植结果。
Clin Transplant. 2005 Aug;19(4):433-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00378.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the drivers of patient satisfaction in the United States hospitals: Assessing quality indicators across regions.揭示美国医院患者满意度的驱动因素:评估各地区的质量指标。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0324737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324737. eCollection 2025.
2
Measuring patients' experience with renal services in the UK: development and validation of the Kidney PREM.测量英国肾脏服务患者体验: Kidney PREM 的开发与验证。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Jul 26;37(8):1507-1519. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac030.
3
Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.
患者相关因素和围手术期结局与脊柱手术后的自我报告医院评分相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):643-652. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000892.
4
Should quality of the liver transplant candidate evaluation be measured?肝脏移植候选者评估的质量应该被衡量吗?
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2016 Oct 2;8(3):64-67. doi: 10.1002/cld.572. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Quality Metrics in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.实体器官移植中的质量指标:系统评价。
Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):e308-e330. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002149.
6
Hispanics' Satisfaction with Free Clinic Providers: An Analysis of Patient-Centered Medical Home Characteristics.西班牙裔对免费诊所提供者的满意度:以患者为中心的医疗之家特征分析
J Community Health. 2016 Dec;41(6):1290-1297. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0218-2.
7
Relationship Between Adolescent Report of Patient-Centered Care and of Quality of Primary Care.青少年对以患者为中心的护理及初级护理质量的报告之间的关系
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(8):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.