• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道胆囊切除术后的疼痛:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验

Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Borchert Dietmar H, Federlein Matthias, Fritze-Büttner Frauke, Burghardt Jens, Liersch-Löhn Britta, Atas Yüksel, Müller Verena, Rückbeil Oskar, Wagenpfeil Stefan, Gräber Stefan, Gellert Klaus

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, and Institute of Biometry, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Saarland University Hospitals, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1886-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2
PMID:24464385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has the potential to reduce postoperative pain. We compared postoperative pain in the hybrid NOTES procedure transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy (TVC) with standard conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

DESIGN

Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in a level II hospital between June 2008 and June 2012.

METHODS

Female patients, older than 18 years of age with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis were randomized to receive either TVC or CLC. The follow-up period was 7 days and the primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain. We hypothesized that there is no reduction of pain (Visual Rating Scale ≥1) while resting or coughing over a 48-h period after the operation. Secondary outcome included wound infections, complications, and patient reported outcomes. Sealed envelopes with computer-generated randomization information were kept for allocation in theater. All patients received opaque wound dressing, as in standard four-trocar cholecystectomy and a vaginal tamponade. Theater protocol and surgical notes were kept separate after the procedure.

RESULTS

Overall, 97 of 426 patients assessed for participation were randomized for either TVC or CLC. A total of 41 patients had a TVC and 51 had a CLC. Five patients were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, or hospital stay, but anesthetic and surgical times were significantly longer in TVC (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in postoperative pain between the two groups while resting or coughing. Complications included conversion to laparotomy, bleeding, wound infections, and re-admission. No difference in the rate of complications between the two groups was seen. Overall, 86 and 93% of CLC and TVC patients, respectively, would recommend the procedure to other patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study, no significant difference in pain on days 1 and 2 postoperatively between the two methods was found. The safety profile of TVC is comparable to CLC, and TVC patients would generally recommend this procedure to other patients.

摘要

背景

经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)有可能减轻术后疼痛。我们比较了经阴道视频辅助胆囊切除术(TVC)这种混合NOTES手术与标准传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)的术后疼痛情况。

设计

2008年6月至2012年6月在一家二级医院进行的单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。

方法

年龄大于18岁且有症状性胆囊结石的女性患者被随机分为接受TVC或CLC治疗。随访期为7天,研究的主要结局是术后疼痛。我们假设术后48小时内休息或咳嗽时疼痛(视觉评分量表≥1)无减轻。次要结局包括伤口感染、并发症及患者报告的结局。装有计算机生成随机化信息的密封信封留存于手术室用于分配。所有患者均接受不透明伤口敷料,如同标准四孔胆囊切除术及阴道填塞。术后手术流程记录和手术笔记分开保存。

结果

总体而言,426名评估参与的患者中有97名被随机分配接受TVC或CLC治疗。共有41例患者接受TVC,51例接受CLC。5例患者被排除在分析之外。年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级或住院时间方面无差异,但TVC的麻醉和手术时间显著更长(p < 0.001)。两组患者休息或咳嗽时术后疼痛无统计学差异。并发症包括中转开腹、出血、伤口感染及再次入院。两组并发症发生率未见差异。总体而言,CLC和TVC患者分别有86%和93%会向其他患者推荐该手术。

结论

本研究中,两种方法术后第1天和第2天的疼痛无显著差异。TVC的安全性与CLC相当,且TVC患者一般会向其他患者推荐该手术。

相似文献

1
Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.经阴道胆囊切除术后的疼痛:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1886-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
[Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].[经阴道胆囊切除术:一项随机研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):825-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2852-5.
3
Less pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center pooled analysis.经阴道胆囊切除术后疼痛减轻:单中心汇总分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2573-2576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5263-5. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
4
Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.经阴道混合式NOTES胆囊切除术安全性和益处的系统分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 14;21(38):10915-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10915.
5
Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.经阴道/经脐混合式——NOTES——与三套管针腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比:一项随机临床试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):451-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218.
6
Comparison of outcome and side effects between conventional and transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Oct;24(5):395-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000066.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: results of a prospective comparative single-center study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术胆囊切除术的前瞻性比较单中心研究结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.039. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease: A meta-analysis.经阴道胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊疾病的Meta分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5393-406. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5393.
9
Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy.经阴道辅助胆囊切除术的前瞻性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2378-1. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
10
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.单孔与NOTES 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比有临床或美容优势吗?一项比较单孔经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Management of Benign Gallbladder Diseases.内镜治疗良性胆囊疾病。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 2;35(9):681-689. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.24149.
2
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术-美国军方的长期随访经验。
JSLS. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059.
3
Feasibility and safety of hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for colon cancer: Protocol for a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial (vNOTESCA).

本文引用的文献

1
Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.经阴道/经脐混合式——NOTES——与三套管针腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比:一项随机临床试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):451-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
3
经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗结肠癌的可行性与安全性:一项多中心、单臂、II期试验(vNOTESCA)方案
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 23;9(10):e20187. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20187. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Which Cholecystectomy do Medical Students Prefer?医学生更喜欢哪种胆囊切除术?
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00086.
5
Does obesity influence the results in Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy?肥胖是否会影响经阴道杂交NOTES 胆囊切除术的结果?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4632-4638. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6216-y. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Transrectal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy can be performed without peritoneal contamination: a controlled porcine survival study.经直肠硬性杂交NOTES 胆囊切除术可在无腹膜污染的情况下进行:一项有对照的猪存活研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):478-484. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5804-6. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Hybrid Transvaginal NOTES and Mini-Laparoscopic Colectomy: Benefit Through Synergy.经阴道NOTES与微型腹腔镜联合结肠切除术:协同增效带来益处
JSLS. 2016 Oct-Dec;20(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00062.
8
Less pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center pooled analysis.经阴道胆囊切除术后疼痛减轻:单中心汇总分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2573-2576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5263-5. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.NOTES胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Oct;26(5):347-353. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000284.
10
New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.胆囊切除术的新型微创方法:文献综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct 27;7(10):243-8. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.243.
Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a series of 102 patients.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术的并发症:102 例系列研究。
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):744-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182916138.
4
Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases.经阴道胆囊切除术 50 例连续病例的临床结果和患者报告的结局。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 May;17(5):907-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2175-8. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
5
The Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks): A nationwide registry for quality assurance of gallstone surgery.瑞典胆囊结石手术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(GallRiks)登记处:一个全国性的胆囊结石手术质量保证登记处。
JAMA Surg. 2013 May;148(5):471-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1221.
6
Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy.经阴道辅助胆囊切除术的前瞻性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2378-1. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250).前瞻性随机临床试验比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和杂交自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)(NCT00835250)。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3435-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
Patient and physician perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic appendectomy.患者和医生对经自然腔道内镜阑尾切除术的看法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr 21;18(15):1800-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i15.1800.
9
Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study.经阴道胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2823-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2253-0. Epub 2012 May 2.
10
Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study.经阴道-杂交与单孔入路与“传统”腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):709-15. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0769-8. Epub 2011 Mar 8.