• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术胆囊切除术的前瞻性比较单中心研究结果。

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: results of a prospective comparative single-center study.

机构信息

The International Translational Medicine and Biomodeling Research team, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia; Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Department of Surgery, Danat Al Emarat Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; The New European Surgical Academy (NESA), Berlin, Germany.

The International Translational Medicine and Biomodeling Research team, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia; The New European Surgical Academy (NESA), Berlin, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ioannina State General Hospital G. Chatzikosta, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.039. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.039
PMID:28993135
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in female individuals has been challenged recently by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy (TVC). TVC has not been widely accepted as a standard procedure, even though it is reported to be a safe and painless alternative to LC. This prospective comparative study aims to not only prove equality of TVC and LC but to underline the advantages of TVC over LC with regard to postoperative pain.

METHODS

This study presents an analysis of a single-center and single-surgeon study with 226 unselected consecutive cholecystectomies performed as either TVC or LC.

RESULTS

A total of 226 female patients underwent surgery with either LC (136 cases) or TVC (90 cases). There were no postoperative adverse events. Twenty-two patients (24.2%) in the TVC group indicated 0 (no pain) on a visual analog scale postoperatively, whereas only 5 patients (3.7%) did so in the LC group (P = < .0001). Overall consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was significantly less (P < .0001; t test) in the TVC group (mean, 1.2 ± 0.11 g) compared with the LC group (mean, 2.1 ± 0.1 g). Twenty-three patients (25.5%) in the TVC group needed no postoperative analgesics at all.

CONCLUSIONS

TVC is a safe and painless procedure for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who are from various ethnic and cultural origins. This benefit, along with an equal safety profile compared with LC, should pave the way for wider application of TVC in women.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)最近受到经阴道自然腔道内镜手术胆囊切除术(TVC)的挑战。尽管 TVC 被报道为 LC 的一种安全、无痛的替代方法,但它尚未被广泛接受为标准手术。本前瞻性对照研究旨在不仅证明 TVC 和 LC 的平等性,而且强调 TVC 在术后疼痛方面优于 LC。

方法

本研究分析了单中心、单外科医生的研究,共有 226 例未经选择的连续胆囊切除术,分为 TVC 或 LC 组。

结果

共有 226 名女性患者接受了手术,其中 136 例接受了 LC,90 例接受了 TVC。两组均无术后不良事件。TVC 组 22 例(24.2%)患者术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)为 0(无疼痛),而 LC 组仅 5 例(3.7%)(P<0.0001)。TVC 组(平均 1.2±0.11g)的非甾体抗炎药总消耗量明显低于 LC 组(平均 2.1±0.1g)(P<0.0001;t 检验)。TVC 组 23 例(25.5%)患者根本不需要术后止痛药。

结论

对于来自不同种族和文化背景的有症状胆石症患者,TVC 是一种安全、无痛的手术。与 LC 相比,这种优势以及相当的安全性,应有助于 TVC 在女性中的更广泛应用。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: results of a prospective comparative single-center study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术胆囊切除术的前瞻性比较单中心研究结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.039. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
2
Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.经阴道混合式NOTES胆囊切除术安全性和益处的系统分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 14;21(38):10915-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10915.
3
Comparison of immediate postoperative pain after transvaginal versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后即刻疼痛的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1141-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3294-8.
4
Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经阴道杂交NOTES 胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的短期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3058-66. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2313-5. Epub 2012 May 2.
5
Long-term results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy--an analysis of 88 patients.经阴道/经脐与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的长期结果——88 例患者的分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Apr;398(4):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1071-8. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
6
Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.经阴道胆囊切除术后的疼痛:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1886-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study.经阴道/经脐胆囊切除术比传统腹腔镜技术术后疼痛更少:一项匹配队列研究的短期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):580-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2490-2. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.单孔与NOTES 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比有临床或美容优势吗?一项比较单孔经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.
9
Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study.经阴道-杂交与单孔入路与“传统”腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):709-15. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0769-8. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
[Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].[经阴道胆囊切除术:一项随机研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):825-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2852-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
2
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术-美国军方的长期随访经验。
JSLS. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059.
3
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity matching study.
经阴道与经腹右结肠癌标本提取手术:一项倾向匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1168961. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168961. eCollection 2023.
4
Women's Perception of Transgastric and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) - Impact of Medical Education, Stage of Life and Cross-Cultural Aspects.女性对经胃和经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)的认知——医学教育、生活阶段及跨文化因素的影响
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 29;14:1881-1895. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S382457. eCollection 2022.
5
Safety and Feasibility of Vaginal Delivery in Full-Term Pregnancy After Transvaginal-Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Case Series.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术术后足月妊娠阴道分娩的安全性与可行性:病例系列
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 28;9:888281. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.888281. eCollection 2022.
6
[Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].[标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术替代技术的临床价值——单孔、减少孔道、机器人手术、经自然腔道内镜手术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jun;93(6):566-576. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01608-9. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.手术跨学科的附加值——乔尔-科恩腹部切口
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 1;67:102455. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102455. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: The Chinese experience.泌尿外科自然腔道内镜手术:中国经验
Asian J Urol. 2020 Jan;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 6.