• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出院当天的植入式设备诊断可识别出有心力衰竭早期再入院风险增加的心力衰竭患者。

Implantable device diagnostics on day of discharge identify heart failure patients at increased risk for early readmission for heart failure.

作者信息

Small Roy S, Whellan David J, Boyle Andrew, Sarkar Shantanu, Koehler Jodi, Warman Eduardo N, Abraham William T

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;16(4):419-25. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.48.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.48
PMID:24464745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4238830/
Abstract

AIMS

We hypothesized that diagnostic data in implantable devices evaluated on the day of discharge from a heart failure hospitalization (HFH) can identify patients at risk for HF readmission (HFR) within 30 days.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective analysis of four studies enrolling patients with CRT devices, we identified patients with a HFH, device data on the day of discharge, and 30-day post-discharge clinical follow-up. Four diagnostic criteria were evaluated on the discharge day: (i) intrathoracic impedance>8 Ω below reference impedance; (ii) AF burden>6 h; (iii) CRT pacing<90%; and (iv) night heart rate>80 b.p.m. Patients were considered to have higher risk for HFR if ≥2 criteria were met, average risk if 1 criterion was met, and lower risk if no criteria were met. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the groups. The data cohort consisted of a total of 265 HFHs in 175 patients, of which 36 (14%) were followed by HFR. On the discharge day, ≥2 criteria were met in 43 (16% of 265 HFHs), only 1 criterion was met in 92 (35%), and none of the four criteria were met in 130 HFHs (49%); HFR rates were 28, 16, and 7%, respectively. HFH with ≥2 criteria met was five times more likely to have HFR compared with HFH with no criteria met (adjusted hazard ratio 5.0; 95% confidence interval 1.9–13.5, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Device-derived diagnostic criteria evaluated on the day of discharge identified patients at significantly higher risk of HFR.

摘要

目的

我们假设,在因心力衰竭住院(HFH)出院当天评估的植入式设备诊断数据能够识别出30天内有心力衰竭再入院(HFR)风险的患者。

方法与结果

在这项对四项纳入CRT设备患者的研究的回顾性分析中,我们确定了患有HFH、出院当天的设备数据以及出院后30天临床随访情况的患者。在出院当天评估了四项诊断标准:(i)胸腔内阻抗低于参考阻抗8Ω以上;(ii)房颤负荷>6小时;(iii)CRT起搏<90%;(iv)夜间心率>80次/分钟。如果满足≥2条标准,则认为患者HFR风险较高;满足1条标准则为平均风险;若未满足任何标准,则风险较低。使用Cox比例风险模型对各组进行比较。数据队列共包括175例患者中的265次HFH,其中36例(14%)随后发生HFR。在出院当天,43例(265次HFH中的16%)满足≥2条标准,92例(35%)仅满足1条标准,130次HFH(49%)未满足任何四条标准;HFR发生率分别为28%、16%和7%。满足≥2条标准的HFH发生HFR的可能性是未满足任何标准的HFH的五倍(调整后风险比5.0;95%置信区间1.9 - 13.5,P = 0.001)。

结论

出院当天评估的设备衍生诊断标准可识别出HFR风险显著更高的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/3b6e53e131a3/ejhf0016-0419-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/af3dd13011d4/ejhf0016-0419-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/dc6d560f7618/ejhf0016-0419-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/3b6e53e131a3/ejhf0016-0419-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/af3dd13011d4/ejhf0016-0419-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/dc6d560f7618/ejhf0016-0419-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9a/4238830/3b6e53e131a3/ejhf0016-0419-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Implantable device diagnostics on day of discharge identify heart failure patients at increased risk for early readmission for heart failure.出院当天的植入式设备诊断可识别出有心力衰竭早期再入院风险增加的心力衰竭患者。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;16(4):419-25. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.48.
2
Development of a method to risk stratify patients with heart failure for 30-day readmission using implantable device diagnostics.利用植入式设备诊断开发一种对心力衰竭患者进行 30 天再入院风险分层的方法。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.050. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
3
Stratifying patients at the risk of heart failure hospitalization using existing device diagnostic thresholds.使用现有设备诊断阈值对有心力衰竭住院风险的患者进行分层。
Heart Lung. 2015 Mar-Apr;44(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Prediction of heart failure hospitalizations based on the direct measurement of intrathoracic impedance.基于胸腔内阻抗直接测量对心力衰竭住院情况的预测
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):3040-3048. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12930. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations: results from PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) study.心脏衰竭装置联合诊断可识别出后续有更高心力衰竭住院风险的患者:来自 PARTNERS HF(心力衰竭患者趋势信息获取、评估和症状相关性研究计划)研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.089.
6
Heart failure hospitalization: An important prognostic factor for heart failure re-admission and mortality.心力衰竭住院治疗:心力衰竭再入院和死亡率的一个重要预后因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.080. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting.开发并验证一种源自植入式设备监测参数的综合诊断算法,以识别在门诊环境中心力衰竭住院风险患者。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(31):2472-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht083. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
Discharge Processes and 30-Day Readmission Rates of Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure on General Medicine and Cardiology Services.普通内科和心内科服务中因心力衰竭住院患者的出院流程及30天再入院率
Am J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;121(9):1076-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.027. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Validation of the Readmission Risk Score in Heart Failure Patients at a Tertiary Hospital.三级医院心力衰竭患者再入院风险评分的验证。
J Card Fail. 2015 Nov;21(11):885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的比较效果:来自国家心血管数据注册中心植入式心律转复除颤器注册研究的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Prediction in Transition: MAGGIC Score Performance at Discharge and Incremental Utility of Natriuretic Peptides.过渡时期的风险预测:MAGGIC 评分在出院时的表现和利钠肽的增量效用。
J Card Fail. 2020 Jan;26(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
Device-detected congestion is associated with worse patient-reported outcomes in heart failure.设备检测到的充血与心力衰竭患者报告的结局更差相关。
Heart Lung. 2019 May-Jun;48(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Redefining the role of biomarkers in heart failure trials: expert consensus document.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting.开发并验证一种源自植入式设备监测参数的综合诊断算法,以识别在门诊环境中心力衰竭住院风险患者。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(31):2472-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht083. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
2
Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia.心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎患者住院后 30 天内再入院的诊断和时间。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 23;309(4):355-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.216476.
3
重新定义生物标志物在心力衰竭试验中的作用:专家共识文件。
Heart Fail Rev. 2017 May;22(3):263-277. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9608-5.
Burden of atrial fibrillation and poor rate control detected by continuous monitoring and the risk for heart failure hospitalization.
通过连续监测发现的心房颤动负担和较差的心率控制与心力衰竭住院风险。
Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):616-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.020.
4
Development of a method to risk stratify patients with heart failure for 30-day readmission using implantable device diagnostics.利用植入式设备诊断开发一种对心力衰竭患者进行 30 天再入院风险分层的方法。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.050. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
5
ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.《2012年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》:欧洲心脏病学会2012年急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗特别工作组。与欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)合作制定。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):803-69. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs105.
6
Effect of a telemonitoring-facilitated collaboration between general practitioner and heart failure clinic on mortality and rehospitalization rates in severe heart failure: the TEMA-HF 1 (TElemonitoring in the MAnagement of Heart Failure) study.远程监测促进全科医生与心力衰竭门诊协作对严重心力衰竭患者死亡率和再住院率的影响:TEMA-HF1(心力衰竭管理中的远程监测)研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Mar;14(3):333-40. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr144. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Intrathoracic impedance monitoring, audible patient alerts, and outcome in patients with heart failure.胸腔内阻抗监测、可听患者警报与心力衰竭患者的结局。
Circulation. 2011 Oct 18;124(16):1719-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043042. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Potential value of automated daily screening of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator diagnostics for prediction of major cardiovascular events: results from Home-CARE (Home Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study.自动化每日筛查心脏再同步治疗除颤器诊断对预测主要心血管事件的潜在价值:来自 Home-CARE(心脏再同步治疗中的家庭监测)研究的结果。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Sep;13(9):1019-27. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr089.
9
Intrathoracic impedance vs daily weight monitoring for predicting worsening heart failure events: results of the Fluid Accumulation Status Trial (FAST).胸腔内阻抗与每日体重监测对预测心力衰竭恶化事件的比较:液体蓄积状态试验(FAST)结果
Congest Heart Fail. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):51-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00220.x. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial.无线肺动脉血流动力学监测在慢性心力衰竭中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Feb 19;377(9766):658-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60101-3.