Trask Catherine, Mathiassen Svend Erik, Wahlström Jens, Forsman Mikael
Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 0W8.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 May 1;40(3):252-65. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3416. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
This study compared the cost efficiency of observation and inclinometer assessment of trunk and upper-arm inclination in a population of flight baggage handlers, as an illustration of a general procedure for addressing the trade-off between resource consumption and statistical performance in occupational epidemiology.
Trunk and upper-arm inclination with respect to the line of gravity were assessed for three days on each of 27 airport baggage handlers using simultaneous inclinometer and video recordings. Labor and equipment costs associated with data collection and processing were tracked throughout. Statistical performance was computed from the variance components within and between workers and bias (with inclinometer assumed to produce "correct" inclination angles). The behavior of the trade-off between cost and efficiency with changed sample size, as well as with changed logistics for data collection and processing, was investigated using simulations.
At similar total costs, time spent at trunk and arm inclination angles >60 ° as well as 90 (th)percentile arm inclination were estimated at higher precision using inclinometers, while median inclination and 90th percentile trunk inclination was determined more precisely using observation. This hierarchy remained when the study was reproduced in another population, while inclinometry was more cost-efficient than observation for all three posture variables in a scenario where data were already collected and only needed to be processed.
When statistical performance was measured only in terms of precision, inclinometers were more cost-efficient than observation for two out of three posture metrics investigated. Since observations were biased, inclinometers consistently outperformed observation when both bias and precision were included in statistical performance. This general model for assessing cost efficiency may be used for designing exposure assessment strategies with considerations not only of statistical but also cost criteria. The empirical data provide a specific basis for planning assessments of working postures in occupational groups.
本研究比较了在一组航空行李搬运工中,使用观察法和倾角仪评估躯干和上臂倾斜度的成本效益,以此作为在职业流行病学中解决资源消耗与统计效能之间权衡的一般程序的示例。
对27名机场行李搬运工每人进行为期三天的评估,同时使用倾角仪和视频记录来测量其相对于重力线的躯干和上臂倾斜度。全程跟踪与数据收集和处理相关的劳动力和设备成本。根据工人内部和之间的方差成分以及偏差(假设倾角仪产生“正确”的倾斜角度)计算统计效能。使用模拟研究了随着样本量变化以及数据收集和处理的后勤安排变化,成本与效率之间权衡的行为。
在总成本相似的情况下,使用倾角仪估计躯干和手臂倾斜角度>60°以及第90百分位数手臂倾斜度时所花费时间的精度更高,而使用观察法确定中位数倾斜度和第90百分位数躯干倾斜度更为精确。在另一组人群中重复该研究时,这种层次关系依然存在,而在数据已收集且只需处理的情况下,对于所有三个姿势变量,倾角测量法比观察法更具成本效益。
当仅根据精度衡量统计效能时,在所研究的三个姿势指标中,有两个指标使用倾角仪比观察法更具成本效益。由于观察存在偏差,当统计效能同时包括偏差和精度时,倾角仪始终优于观察法。这种评估成本效益的通用模型可用于设计暴露评估策略,不仅要考虑统计标准,还要考虑成本标准。实证数据为规划职业群体工作姿势评估提供了具体依据。