Suppr超能文献

周期性失血的评估:图像失血评估图记录的个体间和个体内差异

Assessment of periodic blood loss: interindividual and intraindividual variations of pictorial blood loss assessment chart registrations.

作者信息

Hald Kirsten, Lieng Marit

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To explore the interindividual and intraindividual variation of Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) registrations of subjective perception of minimal, normal, and heavy menstrual bleeding in women using their usual sanitary protection.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

University tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

Women who had participated in 4 previously published prospective studies using PBAC as the outcome measure.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent hysteroscopic removal of polyps, laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels, or uterine artery embolization, and control subjects received no treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PBAC scores, hemoglobin concentration, and subjective assessment of periodic blood loss were recorded in 429 women during 1049 menstrual cycles. The median PBAC values in groups of women who assessed their bleeding as light, normal, and heavy were 45.0, 116.0, and 254.5, respectively (p < .001). Sensitivity and specificity for specific PBAC cutoff points were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The maximum sensitivity for assessment of heavy periodic blood loss (78.5) was reached at a PBAC score of 160. The corresponding specificity was 75.8. At PBAC values below 130, 90% of the women reported normal blood loss, and 91% had hemoglobin values >12.0 g/dL. The reliability of repeated PBAC scores for individual measures was assessed via calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient, which for repeated PBAC measurements was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.90) for average measures.

CONCLUSION

The interindividual variation was high, and the intraindividual variation was low. A low PBAC score may be used to define treatment end points for clinical use or in trials.

摘要

研究目的

探讨使用常规卫生防护用品的女性,其通过图片式失血评估图(PBAC)记录的月经量少、正常及月经量多的主观感受在个体间和个体内的差异。

设计

回顾性研究(加拿大工作组分类II-3)。

地点

大学三级医院。

患者

曾参与4项先前发表的以PBAC为结局指标的前瞻性研究的女性。

干预措施

患者接受宫腔镜息肉切除术、腹腔镜子宫血管封堵术或子宫动脉栓塞术,对照组未接受治疗。

测量指标及主要结果

在429名女性的1049个月经周期中记录PBAC评分、血红蛋白浓度及周期性失血的主观评估。将月经量评估为少、正常及多的女性组中,PBAC的中位数分别为45.0、116.0和254.5(p <.001)。使用受试者工作特征曲线计算特定PBAC截断点的敏感性和特异性。PBAC评分为160时,评估月经量多的最大敏感性为78.5。相应的特异性为75.8。PBAC值低于130时,90%的女性报告失血正常,91%的女性血红蛋白值>12.0 g/dL。通过计算组内相关系数评估个体测量中重复PBAC评分的可靠性,平均测量的重复PBAC测量的组内相关系数为0.86(95%置信区间,0.80-0.90)。

结论

个体间差异大,个体内差异小。低PBAC评分可用于定义临床使用或试验中的治疗终点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验