van den Hoven Andor F, Smits Maarten L J, de Keizer Bart, van Leeuwen Maarten S, van den Bosch Maurice A A J, Lam Marnix G E H
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands,
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;37(6):1482-93. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0845-x. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Failing to identify aberrant hepatic arteries before radioembolization (RE) may compromise its treatment efficacy due to inadequate biodistribution of radioactive microspheres. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how often aberrant hepatic arteries were identified correctly in clinical practice, with computed tomography (CT), and during angiography in patients with liver tumors who received a workup for RE.
The presence and vascularization pattern of aberrant (i.e., accessory and replaced) hepatic arteries was assessed on triphasic liver CT in 110 patients. Subsequently, radiological reports on CT and angiographic procedures were reviewed to determine whether aberrant hepatic arteries were identified correctly in clinical practice. The intrahepatic biodistribution of (99m)Tc-MAA and radioactive microspheres was assessed on SPECT/CT and PET/CT in all patients with unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries.
Thirty-seven of 110 patients (34%) had aberrant hepatic arteries. In 18 of 37 (49%) patients, the aberrant hepatic arteries were correctly identified on CT and in 32 of 37 (86%) during angiography. Aberrant right hepatic arteries were identified more frequently than aberrant left hepatic arteries on CT (54 vs. 44%) and during angiography (100 vs. 69%, p = 0.007). In five patients (14%), an aberrant left hepatic artery remained unidentified, resulting in a lack of (99m)Tc-MAA and (90)Y activity in the segmental territory of the unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries.
Aberrant left hepatic arteries were the most common unidentified aberrant hepatic arteries, resulting in incomplete radiation coverage. We formulated a practical approach to identify aberrant hepatic arteries correctly before RE.
在放射性栓塞(RE)前未能识别出异常肝动脉可能会因放射性微球的生物分布不足而影响其治疗效果。本研究的目的是评估在临床实践中、通过计算机断层扫描(CT)以及在接受RE检查的肝肿瘤患者的血管造影过程中,异常肝动脉被正确识别的频率。
对110例患者的肝脏进行三期CT扫描,评估异常(即副肝动脉和替代肝动脉)肝动脉的存在情况和血管分布模式。随后,回顾CT和血管造影检查的放射学报告,以确定在临床实践中异常肝动脉是否被正确识别。对所有未识别出异常肝动脉的患者,通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)评估(99m)锝-大颗粒聚合人血清白蛋白((99m)Tc-MAA)和放射性微球在肝内生物分布。
110例患者中有37例(34%)存在异常肝动脉。在37例患者中的18例(49%),异常肝动脉在CT上被正确识别,在血管造影时37例中的32例(86%)被正确识别;在CT上异常右肝动脉比异常左肝动脉更常被识别(54%对44%),在血管造影时也是如此(100%对69%,p = 0.007);5例患者(14%)未识别出异常左肝动脉;导致在未识别出的异常肝动脉的节段区域缺乏(99m)Tc-MAA和(90)钇((90)Y)活性。
异常左肝动脉是最常见的未识别出的异常肝动脉,导致辐射覆盖不完全;我们制定了一种实用方法以便在RE前正确识别异常肝动脉