Ball Trever J, Joy Elizabeth A, Goh Tan L, Hannon James C, Gren Lisa H, Shaw Janet M
1Department of Exercise and Sport Science,University of Utah,Salt Lake City,UT,USA.
2Department of Family and Preventive Medicine,University of Utah,Salt Lake City,UT,USA.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jan;16(1):100-8. doi: 10.1017/S1463423613000479. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
To date, no physical activity (PA) questionnaires intended for primary care have been compared against a criterion measure of PA and current (2008) aerobic PA recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine/American Heart Association (ACSM/AHA).
This study evaluated preliminary evidence for criterion validity of two brief (<1 min) PA questionnaires with accelerometry, and their ability to identify if individuals meet ACSM/AHA PA recommendations.
45 health clinic staff wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days and afterwards completed two brief PA questionnaires, the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), and the Speedy Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment (SNAP). Agreement and descriptive statistics were calculated between the PAVS or SNAP and accelerometry in order to measure each questionnaire's ability to quantify the number of days participants achieved ⩾ 30 min of moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) performed in bouts of ⩾ 10 continuous minutes. Participants with <5 days of ⩾ 30 bout-min of MVPA were considered insufficiently active according to PA recommendations.
There was a significant positive correlation between number of days with ⩾ 30 bout-min MVPA and the PAVS (r = 0.52, P < 0.001), and SNAP ( r= 0.31, P < 0.05). The PAVS had moderate agreement with accelerometry for identifying if individuals met or did not meet PA recommendations (κ = 0.46, P < 0.001), whereas SNAP had poor agreement (κ = 0.12, P < 0.05).
This study provides preliminary evidence of criterion validity of the PAVS and SNAP with accelerometry and agreement identifying if respondents meet current (2008) ACSM/AHA aerobic PA recommendations. The PAVS and SNAP should be evaluated further for repeatability, and in populations varying in PA levels, age, gender, and ethnicity.
迄今为止,尚无用于初级保健的体力活动(PA)问卷与PA的标准测量方法以及美国运动医学学院/美国心脏协会(ACSM/AHA)当前(2008年)的有氧PA建议进行比较。
本研究评估了两份简短(<1分钟)PA问卷与加速度计的标准效度的初步证据,以及它们识别个体是否符合ACSM/AHA PA建议的能力。
45名健康诊所工作人员连续七天佩戴加速度计,之后完成两份简短的PA问卷,即体力活动生命体征(PAVS)和快速营养与体力活动评估(SNAP)。计算PAVS或SNAP与加速度计之间的一致性和描述性统计量,以衡量每份问卷量化参与者在持续时间≥10分钟的时段内达到≥30分钟中等至剧烈PA(MVPA)天数的能力。根据PA建议,MVPA<5天且时长≥30分钟的参与者被视为体力活动不足。
MVPA≥30分钟时段的天数与PAVS(r = 0.52,P < 0.001)和SNAP(r = 0.31,P < .05)之间存在显著正相关。PAVS与加速度计在识别个体是否符合PA建议方面具有中等一致性(κ = 0.46,P < 0.001),而SNAP的一致性较差(κ = 0.12,P < 0.05)。
本研究提供了PAVS和SNAP与加速度计的标准效度以及识别受访者是否符合当前(2008年)ACSM/AHA有氧PA建议的一致性的初步证据。应进一步评估PAVS和SNAP的可重复性,以及在PA水平、年龄、性别和种族不同的人群中的适用性。