• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社交健康网络与一般互联网网站在线寻求健康信息的患者特征:一项比较研究。

Characteristics of patients seeking health information online via social health networks versus general Internet sites: a comparative study.

作者信息

Magnezi Racheli, Grosberg Dafna, Novikov Ilya, Ziv Arnona, Shani Mordechai, Freedman Laurence S

机构信息

Department of Management, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel and.

出版信息

Inform Health Soc Care. 2015 Mar;40(2):125-38. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.879147. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

DOI:10.3109/17538157.2013.879147
PMID:24475937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Camoni.co.il, a Hebrew-language social health network offers advice, consultation, and connection to others with chronic illness. This study compared characteristics and objectives of Camoni.co.il users and individuals seeking medical information through general Internet sites.

METHODS

Similar questionnaires were sent to 1009 Internet and 900 Camoni users. Cluster analysis defined four modes of online social health network use: "acquiring information and support", "communicating", "networking" and "browsing".

RESULTS

Six hundred and five Internet and 125 Camoni users responded. Diabetes, hypertension, obesity and lung diseases were found more often among general Internet users than Camoni users. Among Camoni users, "acquiring information and support" was the main motivation for individuals over age 55 years, women, those with lower income, chronic pain, obesity and depression. "Communicating" was the main incentive of men, those 20-34 years old, those with less education, or an eating disorder. "Networking" was the most significant motivation for those with multiple sclerosis or depression. Browsing was most frequent among individuals with multiple sclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying needs of social health network surfers will allow planning unique contents and enhancing social health sites. Physicians might advise patients to use them to obtain support and information regarding their conditions, possibly leading to improved compliance and self-management.

摘要

背景

Camoni.co.il是一个希伯来语的社会健康网络,提供建议、咨询,并帮助慢性病患者相互联系。本研究比较了Camoni.co.il用户与通过一般互联网网站寻求医疗信息的个人的特征和目标。

方法

向1009名互联网用户和900名Camoni用户发送了相似的调查问卷。聚类分析确定了在线社会健康网络使用的四种模式:“获取信息与支持”“交流”“建立联系”和“浏览”。

结果

605名互联网用户和125名Camoni用户做出了回应。一般互联网用户中糖尿病、高血压、肥胖和肺部疾病的患者比Camoni用户更多。在Camoni用户中,“获取信息与支持”是55岁以上人群、女性、低收入者、慢性疼痛患者、肥胖者和抑郁症患者的主要动机。“交流”是男性、20 - 34岁人群、受教育程度较低者或饮食失调者的主要动机。“建立联系”是多发性硬化症患者或抑郁症患者最主要的动机。浏览在多发性硬化症患者中最为频繁。

结论

确定社会健康网络浏览者的需求将有助于规划独特的内容并改善社会健康网站。医生可能会建议患者利用这些网站获取有关自身病情的支持和信息,这可能会提高依从性和自我管理能力。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of patients seeking health information online via social health networks versus general Internet sites: a comparative study.通过社交健康网络与一般互联网网站在线寻求健康信息的患者特征:一项比较研究。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2015 Mar;40(2):125-38. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.879147. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
2
Frequent Surfing on Social Health Networks is Associated With Increased Knowledge and Patient Health Activation.频繁浏览社交健康网络与知识增加及患者健康激活相关。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 10;18(8):e212. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5832.
3
Digital divide 2.0: the role of social networking sites in seeking health information online from a longitudinal perspective.数字鸿沟2.0:从纵向视角看社交网站在在线寻求健康信息中的作用
J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):60-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.906522. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
4
Mechanisms of Communicating Health Information Through Facebook: Implications for Consumer Health Information Technology Design.通过脸书传播健康信息的机制:对消费者健康信息技术设计的启示
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 11;18(8):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5949.
5
Online activity and participation in treatment affects the perceived efficacy of social health networks among patients with chronic illness.在线活动和参与治疗会影响慢性病患者对社交健康网络疗效的认知。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 10;16(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2630.
6
Health Information Brokers in the General Population: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013-2014.普通人群中的健康信息中介:对2013 - 2014年健康信息国家趋势调查的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 3;18(6):e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5447.
7
Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.在线支持群组中的社交网络:在线社交网络如何使患者受益。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(6):639-59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
8
It's better to give than to receive: the role of social support, trust, and participation on health-related social networking sites.施比受更有福:社会支持、信任及参与在健康相关社交网站中的作用
J Health Commun. 2014 Dec;19(12):1424-39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.894596. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
9
Chronic Diseases and Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated With Online Health Information Seeking and Using Social Networking Sites: Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Survey in Japan.与在线健康信息搜索和使用社交网站相关的慢性疾病和社会人口统计学特征:日本全国代表性横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 2;25:e44741. doi: 10.2196/44741.
10
Exploring patients' health information communication practices with social network members as a foundation for consumer health IT design.探索患者与社交网络成员的健康信息交流实践,以此作为消费者健康信息技术设计的基础。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 May;84(5):363-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Are YouTube videos on treatments for temporomandibular disorders reliable?: An observational study.YouTube上关于颞下颌关节紊乱症治疗的视频是否可靠?一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 3;104(1):e41213. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041213.
2
Assessing the role of socioeconomic factors-income, education, broadband access, and healthy foods on location-wise disparities in COVID-19 cases.评估社会经济因素——收入、教育、宽带接入和健康食品——对新冠病例地区差异的作用。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 10;83(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01510-w.
3
Bruxism treatment on Youtube: evaluating reliability and information accuracy.
Youtube 上磨牙症治疗相关视频:评估可靠性和信息准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04571-5.
4
Refined Analysis of Older eHealth Users From an Agency Perspective: Quantitative Telephone Interview Study.从机构视角对老年电子健康用户的精细化分析:定量电话访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Apr 26;6:e40004. doi: 10.2196/40004.
5
Peer-to-Peer Health Communication in Older Adults' Online Communities: Protocol for a Qualitative Netnographic Study and Co-Design Approach.老年人在线社区中的对等健康交流:定性网络民族志研究与协同设计方法方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):e19834. doi: 10.2196/19834.
6
How patients experience endocrine therapy for breast cancer: an online survey of side effects, adherence, and medical team support.患者对乳腺癌内分泌治疗的体验:一项关于副作用、依从性和医疗团队支持的在线调查。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00908-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community's Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults.糖尿病在线社区的可信度、社会资本以及帮助与危害认知:婴儿潮一代与年轻成年人的横断面比较
JMIR Aging. 2019 Sep 26;2(2):e10857. doi: 10.2196/10857.
8
Understanding Why Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Join Diabetes Online Communities: Semantic Network Analyses.了解2型糖尿病老年人加入糖尿病在线社区的原因:语义网络分析
JMIR Aging. 2018 Jun 28;1(1):e10649. doi: 10.2196/10649.
9
Diabetes Online Community User Perceptions of Successful Aging With Diabetes: Analysis of a #DSMA Tweet Chat.糖尿病在线社区用户对糖尿病患者成功衰老的认知:#DSMA 推文聊天分析
JMIR Aging. 2018 Jun 22;1(1):e10176. doi: 10.2196/10176.
10
Views of Community Managers on Knowledge Co-creation in Online Communities for People With Disabilities: Qualitative Study.社区管理者对残疾人在线社区知识共创的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7406.