Rollinson Njal, Keith Dave M, Houde Aimee Lee S, Debes Paul V, McBride Meghan C, Hutchings Jeffrey A
Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):529-40. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12188. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
Captive-breeding programs can be implemented to preserve the genetic diversity of endangered populations such that the controlled release of captive-bred individuals into the wild may promote recovery. A common difficulty, however, is that programs are founded with limited wild broodstock, and inbreeding can become increasingly difficult to avoid with successive generations in captivity. Program managers must choose between maintaining the genetic purity of populations, at the risk of inbreeding depression, or interbreeding populations, at the risk of outbreeding depression. We evaluate these relative risks in a captive-breeding program for 3 endangered populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In each of 2 years, we released juvenile F(1) and F(2) interpopulation hybrids, backcrosses, as well as inbred and noninbred within-population crosstypes into 9 wild streams. Juvenile size and survival was quantified in each year. Few crosstype effects were observed, but interestingly, the relative fitness consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding varied from year to year. Temporal variation in environmental quality might have driven some of these annual differences, by exacerbating the importance of maternal effects on juvenile fitness in a year of low environmental quality and by affecting the severity of inbreeding depression differently in different years. Nonetheless, inbreeding was more consistently associated with a negative effect on fitness, whereas the consequences of outbreeding were less predictable. Considering the challenges associated with a sound risk assessment in the wild and given that the effect of inbreeding on fitness is relatively predictable, we suggest that risk can be weighted more strongly in terms of the probable outcome of outbreeding. Factors such as genetic similarities between populations and the number of generations in isolation can sometimes be used to assess outbreeding risk, in lieu of experimentation.
可以实施圈养繁殖计划来保护濒危种群的遗传多样性,以便将圈养繁殖的个体有控制地放归野外可能促进种群恢复。然而,一个常见的困难是,这些计划建立时野生亲鱼数量有限,随着圈养代数的增加,近亲繁殖越来越难以避免。计划管理者必须在维持种群遗传纯度(冒着近亲繁殖衰退的风险)和种群杂交(冒着远交衰退的风险)之间做出选择。我们在一个针对3个濒危大西洋鲑(Salmo salar)种群的圈养繁殖计划中评估了这些相对风险。在两年中的每一年,我们都将幼鱼阶段的F(1)和F(2)种群间杂交种、回交种,以及种群内近亲繁殖和非近亲繁殖的杂交类型放归到9条野生溪流中。每年都对幼鱼的大小和存活率进行量化。观察到的杂交类型效应很少,但有趣的是,近亲繁殖和远交繁殖的相对适合度后果每年都有所不同。环境质量的时间变化可能导致了其中一些年度差异,在环境质量较差的年份,它加剧了母体效应对幼鱼适合度的重要性,并在不同年份以不同方式影响近亲繁殖衰退的严重程度。尽管如此,近亲繁殖更一致地与对适合度的负面影响相关,而远交繁殖的后果则较难预测。考虑到在野外进行合理风险评估的相关挑战,并且鉴于近亲繁殖对适合度的影响相对可预测,我们建议可以根据远交繁殖的可能结果更重地权衡风险。种群之间的遗传相似性和隔离代数等因素有时可用于评估远交繁殖风险,以代替实验。