Lapish Christopher C, Ahn Kee-Chan, Chambers R Andrew, Ashby Donovan M, Ahn Soyon, Phillips Anthony G
Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1754-62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.23. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
There is a critical need to develop novel pharmacotherapeutics capable of addressing the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Building on recent studies with a racemic mixture of the synthetic tetrahydroprotoberberine, D,L-Govadine, we isolated the D- and L-stereoisomers and employed a battery of behavioral, neurochemical, and electrophysiological procedures to assess their individual therapeutic potential. Rodent models predictive of antipsychotic efficacy and those that model positive symptoms were employed and we found that L-Govadine, but not D-Govadine, improved these measures. Pretreatment with either stereoisomer during CS pre-exposure prevented the disruption of latent inhibition by amphetamine. Moreover, pretreatment with either stereoisomer also improved deficits in social interaction in the neonatal ventral hippocampal lesioned rat. Improved cognitive performance in two different prefrontal cortex-dependent tasks was observed with D-, but not L-Govadine, which strongly suggests that the D-steroisomer may be an effective cognitive enhancer. Alterations in dopamine efflux were also assessed and L-Govadine increased dopamine efflux in both the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. However, D-Govadine only increased dopamine efflux in the prefrontal cortex and not in the nucleus accumbens. Electrophysiological studies confirmed that L-Govadine is a DA-D2 antagonist, whereas D-Govadine shows no appreciable physiological effects at this receptor. Collectively these data show that L-Govadine performs well on measures predictive of antipsychotic efficacy and rodent models of positive symptoms through antagonism of DA-D2 receptors, whereas D-Govadine improves impairments in compromised memory function in delayed response tasks possibly through selective increases in DA efflux in the frontal cortex.
迫切需要开发能够解决精神分裂症的阳性、阴性和认知症状的新型药物疗法。基于最近对合成四氢原小檗碱外消旋混合物D,L-戈瓦定的研究,我们分离出了D-和L-立体异构体,并采用了一系列行为、神经化学和电生理程序来评估它们各自的治疗潜力。我们使用了预测抗精神病疗效的啮齿动物模型以及模拟阳性症状的模型,发现L-戈瓦定而非D-戈瓦定改善了这些指标。在条件刺激(CS)预暴露期间用任何一种立体异构体预处理都可防止苯丙胺破坏潜伏抑制。此外,用任何一种立体异构体预处理还改善了新生腹侧海马损伤大鼠的社交互动缺陷。观察到D-戈瓦定而非L-戈瓦定在两种不同的前额叶皮质依赖性任务中改善了认知表现,这强烈表明D-立体异构体可能是一种有效的认知增强剂。我们还评估了多巴胺流出的变化,L-戈瓦定增加了前额叶皮质和伏隔核中的多巴胺流出。然而,D-戈瓦定仅增加了前额叶皮质中的多巴胺流出,而未增加伏隔核中的多巴胺流出。电生理研究证实L-戈瓦定是一种多巴胺D2拮抗剂,而D-戈瓦定在该受体上未显示出明显的生理效应。这些数据共同表明,L-戈瓦定通过拮抗多巴胺D2受体在预测抗精神病疗效的指标和阳性症状的啮齿动物模型上表现良好,而D-戈瓦定可能通过选择性增加额叶皮质中的多巴胺流出改善延迟反应任务中受损记忆功能的损伤。