Di Somma Salvatore, Lalle Irene, Magrini Laura, Russo Veronica, Navarin Silvia, Castello Luigi, Avanzi Gian Carlo, Di Stasio Enrico, Maisel Alan
Department of Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Italy.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Jun;3(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/2048872614521756. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
Few data are available on diagnostic and prognostic role of quantitative fluid retention evaluated by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) in acute heart failure (AHF) patients at the moment of emergency department presentation.
Point vectors and hydration index (HI) by BIVA were obtained in 381 patients referring to an emergency department. For evaluating cardiovascular events, a 30-day follow-up was performed. Patients were divided into AHF (n=270; 70.8%) and no-AHF groups, (n=111; 29.2%). Compared with the no-AHF cohort, the HI value resulted significantly higher in the AHF group (81.2% ± 6.7 vs. 72.9 ± 3.6%, p<0.001). HI showed a significant diagnostic power for AHF (cut-off 73.4%, area under curve (AUC) 0.87, sensitivity 90%, specificity 54%) and also showed a significant prognostic value both by univariate (odds ratio 1.03 (1-1.07), p =0.025) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 1.96 (1.05-3.66) p= 0.034) for cardiac events at 30 days. Although in the overall population BIVA did not increase diagnostic accuracy provided by brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), for AHF patients in BNP 'grey values' (100-400 pg/ml) HI showed a significant additive improvement for diagnosis (net reclassification improvement (NRI) 77%) and prognosis (NRI 45%).
While in the overall population BIVA did not increase diagnostic accuracy provided by BNP, in AHF patients a quantitative evaluation of fluid congestion obtained by BIVA at the time of emergency department arrival provides significant additive diagnostic and 30-day prognostic value to BNP, particularly in the BNP 'grey-zone'. This could lead to a better management of these patients with possible improvement in reducing subsequent cardiovascular events.
目前关于生物电阻抗矢量分析(BIVA)评估的定量液体潴留对急诊科就诊时急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的诊断和预后作用的数据较少。
对381例到急诊科就诊的患者进行BIVA测量,获取点矢量和水化指数(HI)。为评估心血管事件,进行了为期30天的随访。患者分为AHF组(n = 270;70.8%)和非AHF组(n = 111;29.2%)。与非AHF队列相比,AHF组的HI值显著更高(81.2% ± 6.7 vs. 72.9 ± 3.6%,p < 0.001)。HI对AHF具有显著的诊断能力(截断值73.4%,曲线下面积(AUC)0.87,敏感性90%,特异性54%),并且在单因素分析(比值比1.03(1 - 1.07),p = 0.025)和多因素分析(比值比1.96(1.05 - 3.66),p = 0.034)中对30天时的心脏事件也显示出显著的预后价值。尽管在总体人群中BIVA并未提高脑钠肽(BNP)提供的诊断准确性,但对于BNP处于“灰色值”(100 - 400 pg/ml)的AHF患者,HI在诊断(净重新分类改善(NRI)77%)和预后(NRI 45%)方面显示出显著的附加改善。
虽然在总体人群中BIVA并未提高BNP提供的诊断准确性,但在AHF患者中,急诊科就诊时通过BIVA获得的液体潴留定量评估为BNP提供了显著的附加诊断和30天预后价值,特别是在BNP“灰色区域”。这可能导致对这些患者的更好管理,并可能改善减少后续心血管事件的情况。