• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“被忽视的左侧”,但仅限于遥远的空间:在视觉引导的抓握任务中发现健康参与者的空间偏差。

"Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.

机构信息

Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge, AB , Canada.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2014 Jan 22;5:4. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00004. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2014.00004
PMID:24478751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3898521/
Abstract

Hemispatial neglect is a common outcome of stroke that is characterized by the inability to orient toward, and attend to stimuli in contralesional space. It is established that hemispatial neglect has a perceptual component, however, the presence and severity of motor impairments is controversial. Establishing the nature of space use and spatial biases during visually guided actions amongst healthy individuals is critical to understanding the presence of visuomotor deficits in patients with neglect. Accordingly, three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of object spatial location on patterns of grasping. Experiment 1 required right-handed participants to reach and grasp for blocks in order to construct 3D models. The blocks were scattered on a tabletop divided into equal size quadrants: left near, left far, right near, and right far. Identical sets of building blocks were available in each quadrant. Space use was dynamic, with participants initially grasping blocks from right near space and tending to "neglect" left far space until the final stages of the task. Experiment 2 repeated the protocol with left-handed participants. Remarkably, left-handed participants displayed a similar pattern of space use to right-handed participants. In Experiment 3 eye movements were examined to investigate whether "neglect" for grasping in left far reachable space had its origins in attentional biases. It was found that patterns of eye movements mirrored patterns of reach-to-grasp movements. We conclude that there are spatial biases during visually guided grasping, specifically, a tendency to neglect left far reachable space, and that this "neglect" is attentional in origin. The results raise the possibility that visuomotor impairments reported among patients with right hemisphere lesions when working in contralesional space may result in part from this inherent tendency to "neglect" left far space irrespective of the presence of unilateral visuospatial neglect.

摘要

偏侧空间忽略是中风的常见后果,其特征是无法朝向对侧空间的刺激,并对其进行注意。已经确定偏侧空间忽略具有知觉成分,然而,运动损伤的存在和严重程度存在争议。在健康个体中,在视觉引导的动作中确定空间使用和空间偏差的性质对于理解忽略患者的视动缺陷的存在至关重要。因此,进行了三项实验来研究物体空间位置对抓握模式的影响。实验 1 要求右利手参与者伸手去抓取放在桌上的积木,以构建 3D 模型。积木分散在等分的四个象限的桌面上:左近、左远、右近和右远。每个象限都有相同的积木套件。空间使用是动态的,参与者最初从右近空间抓取积木,并倾向于“忽略”左远空间,直到任务的最后阶段。实验 2 让左利手参与者重复了该方案。值得注意的是,左利手参与者表现出与右利手参与者相似的空间使用模式。在实验 3 中,研究了眼球运动,以探讨对左远可触及空间的抓握“忽略”是否源于注意力偏向。结果发现,眼球运动模式与伸手抓握运动模式相匹配。我们得出的结论是,在视觉引导的抓握过程中存在空间偏差,特别是有一种忽略左远可触及空间的倾向,并且这种“忽略”是源于注意力的。结果表明,报告称在对侧空间中工作的右侧大脑损伤患者存在视动障碍,部分原因可能是这种固有的“忽略”左远空间的倾向,而与单侧视空间忽略的存在无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/98c982c869ea/fneur-05-00004-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/c95a6f805123/fneur-05-00004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/6506dd0fd3ae/fneur-05-00004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/f67e21250693/fneur-05-00004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/678ad99e6962/fneur-05-00004-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/98c982c869ea/fneur-05-00004-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/c95a6f805123/fneur-05-00004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/6506dd0fd3ae/fneur-05-00004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/f67e21250693/fneur-05-00004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/678ad99e6962/fneur-05-00004-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fad/3898521/98c982c869ea/fneur-05-00004-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
"Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.“被忽视的左侧”,但仅限于遥远的空间:在视觉引导的抓握任务中发现健康参与者的空间偏差。
Front Neurol. 2014 Jan 22;5:4. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00004. eCollection 2014.
2
Hemispatial neglect: its effects on visual perception and visually guided grasping.半侧空间忽视:其对视觉感知和视觉引导抓握的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(9):1262-71. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00038-1.
3
Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.忽视症中的视觉搜索模式:个人周边空间与个人外部空间的比较。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):869-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.020. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
4
Right hemispatial ipsilesional neglect with chronic right hemisphere strokes.慢性右半球卒中伴右侧半空间同侧忽视。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 May;40(4):347-356. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1347606. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.忽视症中的检测梯度:个人周边空间与个人外部空间的比较
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.008.
6
Multi-tasking uncovers right spatial neglect and extinction in chronic left-hemisphere stroke patients.多任务揭示慢性左半球中风患者的右侧空间忽视和消退现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Left hemispatial neglect and overt orienting in naturalistic conditions: Role of high-level and stimulus-driven signals.左侧空间忽略与自然状态下的外显转向:高水平和刺激驱动信号的作用。
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:329-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
A kinematic analysis of distractor interference effects during visually guided action in spatial neglect.空间忽视患者视觉引导动作过程中牵张干扰效应的运动学分析
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Mar;7(3):334-43. doi: 10.1017/s1355617701733073.
9
Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.左侧同向性偏盲和左侧单侧空间忽略患者的选择性注意偏向健侧。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 May;128:305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality.使用虚拟现实改善左侧半空间忽视症
Neurology. 2004 Jun 8;62(11):1958-62. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000128183.63917.02.

引用本文的文献

1
Interhemispheric Parietal-Frontal Connectivity Predicts the Ability to Acquire a Nondominant Hand Skill.大脑两半球顶-额部连接预测非优势手技能习得能力。
Brain Connect. 2021 May;11(4):308-318. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0916. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Handedness and Graspability Modify Shifts of Visuospatial Attention to Near-Hand Objects.利手性和可抓握性会改变视觉空间注意力向近手物体的转移。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170542. eCollection 2017.
3
Arm and hand movement: current knowledge and future perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action.伸手抓握动作运动学中的手动不对称性。
Laterality. 2014;19(4):489-507. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.862540. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
Memory representations in natural tasks.自然任务中的记忆表现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Winter;7(1):66-80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66.
3
Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?双手在双手任务中的抓握使用:不同角色的证据?
手臂和手部运动:当前知识与未来展望。
Front Neurol. 2015 Feb 6;6:19. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00019. eCollection 2015.
4
Getting the right grasp on executive function.把握执行功能的关键。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 7;5:285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00285. eCollection 2014.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):455-67. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
4
Neuroimaging reveals enhanced activation in a reach-selective brain area for objects located within participants' typical hand workspaces.神经影像学显示,对于位于参与者典型手工作空间内的物体,大脑中一个与伸手选择相关的区域表现出增强的激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3710-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Impaired delayed but preserved immediate grasping in a neglect patient with parieto-occipital lesions.顶枕叶病变的忽视患者存在延迟性但保留即刻性抓握障碍。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.030. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Spatial hemineglect in humans.人体空间性忽略
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):87-97. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01145-0.
7
Amputees "neglect" the space near their missing hand.截肢者会“忽视”其缺失手部附近的空间。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797609354739. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
8
Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization.惯用手对精准抓握的偏好预测语言偏向。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
9
Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand.这是否在可触及范围内?功能磁共振成像显示,人类顶上枕叶皮层对手可触及的物体进行编码。
J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 8;29(14):4381-91. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0377-09.2009.
10
No neglect-specific deficits in reaching tasks.在伸手任务中没有忽视特异性缺陷。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2616-24. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp016. Epub 2009 Mar 12.