Pind Robert
From Klinikgaarden, Bjerringbro, Denmark.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20;39(9):E581-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000248.
A study on acute low back pain (LBP) in consecutive working patients in a multicenter study in general practice.
LBP costs are enormous in all countries. New guidelines are difficult to introduce. On the basis of a new, specially developed LBP scale, the aims were to predict the duration of sick leave (SL), and to examine if the guidelines concerning bed rest (BR) and referral to radiographical examination were followed.
Pain intensity and heavy work influence the course of SL. A finger-to-floor distance test assesses the mobility of the spine, and both the finger-to-floor distance test and the straight leg raising test (SLRT) can be used to predict the course of LBP. BR or waiting time for treatment or referral will prolong SL. The expectations of patients and general practitioners are strong outcome predictors as is information about the prognosis.
A user-friendly 10-item questionnaire was specifically developed. The scale included the background date. From a predefined scale the patients were subgrouped into 3 categories in relation to SL: (1) "no SL" or "a few days of SL," (2) "1 week of SL," and (3) "more than 2 weeks of SL." The Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables.
Twenty-three doctors examined 207 working patients. A total of 114 patients (56%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. The 10-item scale showed a good correlation between the total score at the first general practitioner visit and predictable time of SL according to the 3 periods.The frequency of BR and referral to radiographical examination was low, and perhaps this was a consequence of using the scale.
The specially developed short and user-friendly 10-item LBP scale was a good predictor of the duration of SL. A low rate of BR and radiographical examination may even be the result of using the scale.
N/A.
在一项多中心全科医学研究中,对连续工作的患者的急性腰痛(LBP)进行研究。
在所有国家,腰痛的花费都非常巨大。新指南难以推行。基于一种新的、专门开发的腰痛量表,目的是预测病假(SL)时长,并检查是否遵循了关于卧床休息(BR)和转诊进行影像学检查的指南。
疼痛强度和繁重工作会影响病假时长。指尖触地距离测试可评估脊柱的活动度,指尖触地距离测试和直腿抬高试验(SLRT)均可用于预测腰痛的病程。卧床休息或等待治疗或转诊的时间会延长病假时长。患者和全科医生的期望是强有力的结果预测因素,预后信息也是如此。
专门开发了一份便于使用的包含10个条目的问卷。该量表包括背景数据。根据病假情况,从预定义量表中将患者分为3类:(1)“无病假”或“病假几天”,(2)“病假1周”,(3)“病假超过2周”。采用Fisher精确检验比较分类变量。
23名医生检查了207名在职患者。共有114名患者(56%)完成了随访问卷。10条目量表显示,首次全科医生就诊时的总分与根据3个时间段预测的病假时间之间具有良好的相关性。卧床休息和转诊进行影像学检查的频率较低,这可能是使用该量表的结果。
专门开发的简短且便于使用的10条目腰痛量表是病假时长的良好预测指标。卧床休息和影像学检查的低比率甚至可能是使用该量表的结果。
无。